Jump to content

User:Newbyguesses/Sandbox: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
bbbbccc
ccc
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<!-- Sign your posts #####on talk pages:######### ~~~~ Cite your sources: <ref></ref> help?:diff -->
{{talkheader}}
* Take a break from editing if [[Wikipedia:The grey zone|fatigue]] is a problem, it's very refreshing!
* For more help, see [[Help:Page history]] and [[Help:Edit summary]], seriously.
* [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines#EXHAUST | Keep ]] discussions focused.
{{Shoutbox sidebar|1=
<!--###### SHOUTBOX ####################################
__
__| |__
\ / Format (please TOP-post!):
\ /
\ / * Your short message text. ~~~~
\/
######### LEAVE SMALL COMMENTS BELOW THIS LINE ######### -->

* At [[User talk:Jimbo Wales/Archive 96#Kudos]], The constant seeking for blame and winners and losers in debate is a poison. Jimbo Wales 22.16 11 February 2012
* Showing some [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:TOE#Community_spirit community spirit]
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:EXHAUST#EXHAUST Keep] discussions focused.
<!--##### LEAVE SMALL COMMENTS ABOVE THIS LINE ######### -->
}}<!--end [[Template:Shoutbox sidebar]]-->

== View latest | 50 | ==
<!-- * Showing some [[wp:TOE#Community spirit|]] -->
Revision history of [[Wikipedia:Verifiability]]
<!-- For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary, seriously. -->
* Revision · Contributors · Users
*
== Wikipedia:Verifiability protected ==
* 00:40, 14 February 2012‎ Elen of the Roads (talk | contribs)‎ [[Miner|m]] [[2K|26,951 bytes)]] [[wp:Protection policy|(Changed protection level]] of Wikipedia:Verifiability: Edit warring / Content dispute: Very lame content dispute at that ([edit=sysop] (expires 00:40, [[February|21 February 2012]] (UTC)) [move=sysop] (indefinite)))
== Edit war on 13 and 14 February ==
=== Edited with the ''under discussion tag'' in place, and removed it ===

* 22:57, 13 February 2012‎ Littleolive oil (talk | contribs)‎ (26,885 bytes) (Undid revision 476721303 by North8000 This is the stable version of the policy. Please settle this on the talk page not by adding tag after tag in order to make a point (talk))

* 21:41, 13 February 2012‎ Dreadstar (talk | contribs)‎ (26,885 bytes) (This is current polcy, does not require a tag)

* 12:51, 13 February 2012‎ Newbyguesses (talk | contribs)‎ (26,885 bytes) (not helping discussion to proceed in an orderly manner any more / take a wider look at the project page/ and the talk page / NB do not edit war)

* 11:10, 13 February 2012‎ Doc9871 (talk | contribs)‎ (26,885 bytes) (Undid revision 476629188 by North8000 (talk) This tag is not going to be here until you get only what you want. The only two users who repeatedly add this tag are not consensus. Stop it.)

* 00:56, 13 February 2012‎ Dreadstar (talk | contribs)‎ (26,778 bytes) (I'd like to see reasoning why this is tagged yet other elements under discussion arent.)

* 00:26, 13 February 2012‎ Dreadstar (talk | contribs)‎ (26,778 bytes) (many aspects are under discussion, why pick just this one.)

* 08:31, 9 February 2012‎ Doc9871 (talk | contribs)‎ (26,748 bytes) (Per talk page. BRD, by all means, please.)
=== Edited without the under discussion tag in place and restored it ===

* 00:15, 14 February 2012‎ S Marshall (talk | contribs)‎ (26,951 bytes) (Undid revision 476732530 by Littleolive oil (talk)—Restoring last stable version. Now requesting page protection)

* 21:46, 13 February 2012‎ North8000 (talk | contribs)‎ (26,951 bytes) (OK, then let's go back to the older, stable version of the tag)

* 20:55, 13 February 2012‎ S Marshall (talk | contribs)‎ (26,927 bytes) (Since editors don't like the tag, let's try a different one.)

* 11:22, 13 February 2012‎ North8000 (talk | contribs)‎ (26,951 bytes) (Undid revision 476630193 by Doc9871 (talk) Please stop removing the tag. Please see the RFC if you forgot.)

* 00:31, 13 February 2012‎ S Marshall (talk | contribs)‎ m (26,844 bytes) (No you don't.)

* 11:04, 9 February 2012‎ North8000 (talk | contribs)‎ (26,813 bytes) (Undid revision 475907573 by Doc9871 (talk) Certainly not resolved)
== Other editors ==
<!-- (cur | prev) 23:23, 11 February 2012‎ FormerIP (talk | contribs)‎ (26,874 bytes) (Per request on talk) -->
== Summary ==
* *No* user breached [[Wikipedia:Editing policy#3RR|wp:3RR|editing policy]]. Some users edited 3 times, depending where it's counted frm. Content dispute, wp:lame, page protected, [[Good night|goodnight]]. <!-- NBG do not edit war (41xx bytes) -->
== Discussion/ToDo/Further action ==
<!-- just another section=header, seriously -->
<!--
If you do not want your writing to be edited, used, and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here. All text that you did not write yourself, except brief excerpts, must be available under terms consistent with Wikipedia's Terms of Use before you submit it. -->
<!-- By clicking the "Save Page" button, you agree to the Terms of Use, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the CC-BY-SA 3.0 License and the GFDL. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license. -->
<!-- disclaimer~~~~ -->
<!-- umm, NBG do not edit war, seriously. -->
=== <small> discuss here, or um, there, or um, welcome, or umm, [[The Tracey Ullman Show | go home]], goodbye <small> ===
<!-- blah blah welcome...etc...arrivederci -->
<small>like it says</small>

Revision as of 02:53, 18 February 2012

Template:Shoutbox sidebar

View latest | 50 |

Revision history of Wikipedia:Verifiability

  • Revision · Contributors · Users

Wikipedia:Verifiability protected

  • 00:40, 14 February 2012‎ Elen of the Roads (talk | contribs)‎ m 26,951 bytes) (Changed protection level of Wikipedia:Verifiability: Edit warring / Content dispute: Very lame content dispute at that ([edit=sysop] (expires 00:40, 21 February 2012 (UTC)) [move=sysop] (indefinite)))

Edit war on 13 and 14 February

Edited with the under discussion tag in place, and removed it

  • 22:57, 13 February 2012‎ Littleolive oil (talk | contribs)‎ (26,885 bytes) (Undid revision 476721303 by North8000 This is the stable version of the policy. Please settle this on the talk page not by adding tag after tag in order to make a point (talk))
  • 21:41, 13 February 2012‎ Dreadstar (talk | contribs)‎ (26,885 bytes) (This is current polcy, does not require a tag)
  • 12:51, 13 February 2012‎ Newbyguesses (talk | contribs)‎ (26,885 bytes) (not helping discussion to proceed in an orderly manner any more / take a wider look at the project page/ and the talk page / NB do not edit war)
  • 11:10, 13 February 2012‎ Doc9871 (talk | contribs)‎ (26,885 bytes) (Undid revision 476629188 by North8000 (talk) This tag is not going to be here until you get only what you want. The only two users who repeatedly add this tag are not consensus. Stop it.)
  • 00:56, 13 February 2012‎ Dreadstar (talk | contribs)‎ (26,778 bytes) (I'd like to see reasoning why this is tagged yet other elements under discussion arent.)
  • 00:26, 13 February 2012‎ Dreadstar (talk | contribs)‎ (26,778 bytes) (many aspects are under discussion, why pick just this one.)
  • 08:31, 9 February 2012‎ Doc9871 (talk | contribs)‎ (26,748 bytes) (Per talk page. BRD, by all means, please.)

Edited without the under discussion tag in place and restored it

  • 00:15, 14 February 2012‎ S Marshall (talk | contribs)‎ (26,951 bytes) (Undid revision 476732530 by Littleolive oil (talk)—Restoring last stable version. Now requesting page protection)
  • 21:46, 13 February 2012‎ North8000 (talk | contribs)‎ (26,951 bytes) (OK, then let's go back to the older, stable version of the tag)
  • 20:55, 13 February 2012‎ S Marshall (talk | contribs)‎ (26,927 bytes) (Since editors don't like the tag, let's try a different one.)
  • 11:22, 13 February 2012‎ North8000 (talk | contribs)‎ (26,951 bytes) (Undid revision 476630193 by Doc9871 (talk) Please stop removing the tag. Please see the RFC if you forgot.)
  • 00:31, 13 February 2012‎ S Marshall (talk | contribs)‎ m (26,844 bytes) (No you don't.)
  • 11:04, 9 February 2012‎ North8000 (talk | contribs)‎ (26,813 bytes) (Undid revision 475907573 by Doc9871 (talk) Certainly not resolved)

Other editors

Summary

  • *No* user breached wp:3RR|editing policy. Some users edited 3 times, depending where it's counted frm. Content dispute, wp:lame, page protected, goodnight.

Discussion/ToDo/Further action

discuss here, or um, there, or um, welcome, or umm, go home, goodbye

like it says