Jump to content

User talk:Darkness Shines: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
MiszaBot III (talk | contribs)
m Archiving 3 thread(s) (older than 24h) to User talk:Darkness Shines/Archive 6.
You have been blocked from editing. (TW)
Line 42: Line 42:


Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the [[Wikipedia:Request for comment|request for comment]] on '''[[Talk:Health insurance mandate#rfc_E8DE1F5|Talk:Health insurance mandate]]'''. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment#suggestions for responding|suggestions for responding]]. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from [[Wikipedia:Feedback request service]].'' <!-- Template:FRS message -->— [[User:RFC&#32;bot|RFC&#32;bot]] ([[User talk:RFC&#32;bot|talk]]) 13:15, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the [[Wikipedia:Request for comment|request for comment]] on '''[[Talk:Health insurance mandate#rfc_E8DE1F5|Talk:Health insurance mandate]]'''. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment#suggestions for responding|suggestions for responding]]. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from [[Wikipedia:Feedback request service]].'' <!-- Template:FRS message -->— [[User:RFC&#32;bot|RFC&#32;bot]] ([[User talk:RFC&#32;bot|talk]]) 13:15, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

== April 2012 ==
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=|link=]] You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''1 week''' for further breach of interaction ban - filing yet another groundless SPI against Top Gun. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. If you would like to be unblocked, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|appeal this block]] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}}, but you should read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first. [[User:Elen of the Roads|Elen of the Roads]] ([[User talk:Elen of the Roads|talk]]) 22:01, 23 April 2012 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-block -->

Revision as of 22:01, 23 April 2012

IP: 129.252.69.40 / GarnetAndBlack = same user

Sorry I was unable to respond. It would have been best if you had read the talk / history pages first.[1][2] User:129.252.69.40 / User:GarnetAndBlack / User:ViperNerd / User:129.252.69.41 are all the same user. I see that you re-reverted some biased / redundant content on Clemson University related pages that User:GarnetAndBlack has been caught pushing through edit-warring / puppetry over the past several years [3][4], which he was already blocked about [5][6]. GarnetAndBlack is just trying to fool people into keeping his content there, which I see he has already done. Seems that various users have been trying to remove the actual sockpuppetry that got left on the article, not the other way around. Apologies & Thanks. ThomasC.Wolfe (talk) 21:34, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I had suspicions but not enough time to follow up, shall be a little more careful henceforth. Darkness Shines (talk) 21:48, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I am a little overwhelmed here. Unlike troll type users, I really don't enjoy this kind of stuff. I really do appreciate you taking the time to look at this stuff. ThomasC.Wolfe (talk) 22:03, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Pardon me, but I'm confused. You "really don't enjoy this kind of stuff"? Well, a look at your User Contributions page sure paints a different picture[7]. Is that what the contributions of a "troll type user" look like? GarnetAndBlack (talk) 04:44, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Would you mind citing your "good faith" re-vert here: I've noticed that it's been referenced to already. [8] Best. ThomasC.Wolfe (talk) 00:10, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see the link here? I'd prefer things that way. Happen to notice your edit got changed again? [9] Feel free to change it back, and add it to my report if it gets reverted again. [User:ThomasC.Wolfe|ThomasC.Wolfe]] (talk) 18:36, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry? What link were? Darkness Shines (talk) 18:49, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Did it go through? ThomasC.Wolfe (talk) 19:54, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You were the IP which posted then? If so your cleared of sockpuppetry Darkness Shines (talk) 20:00, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yep. But I can't believe this guy would actually stalk me to the degree to post my ip on a phony sockpuppetry report. Is there an number I can contact Wikipedia? ThomasC.Wolfe (talk) 20:35, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I would appreciate if you just detail stuff in my email. I feel like my privacy was violated. Thanks. ThomasC.Wolfe (talk) 21:09, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Occupy Wall Street

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Occupy Wall Street. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 00:15, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re my Talk Page

Hi. Did you perchance leave a message on my User Talk Page? There seemed to be a hint or suggestion of something and then 'poof'! Nothing. Was it anything important, that i could help out with pl? Regs, Khani100 (talk) 17:34, 21 April 2012 (UTC)Khani100[reply]

Reverting while ignoring the open discussion on talk page

Well Darkness Shines may you specify why are you insisting to add multiple images of object (tomb) in article related to person (Muhammad Iqbal). And please specify the reason to ignore the ongoing discussion on talk page and reverting the edit here. --Omer123hussain (talk) 22:45, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Now you have self reverted I may consider it. Darkness Shines (talk) 22:47, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Please justify your revert here while the issue was under discussion.--Omer123hussain (talk) 22:54, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I just did. And do not come over here acting all self righteous just because you were edit warring. Darkness Shines (talk) 22:57, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I am responding here to your query left by you on my talk page, Other wise i have no interest to write on others talk page, And discussion was already open on article talk page.--Omer123hussain (talk) 23:12, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Strange, I do not recall leaving a query on your talk page, I do recall leaving you a warning to self revert as you had violated 3RR. See you on the talk page of the article in question. Darkness Shines (talk) 23:15, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Health insurance mandate. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 13:15, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for further breach of interaction ban - filing yet another groundless SPI against Top Gun. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Elen of the Roads (talk) 22:01, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]