User talk:Chaos5023

Officious whining

Hi Chaos5023,

I am sorry we could not come to an agreement regarding the Armageddon MUD wikipedia page. However, your language is inappropriate and not necessary here at Wikipedia. Please refrain from cursing at other uses in the future, and find other ways to mediate disagreements beyond calling them "bullshit" and telling them to "fuck off". I am specifically referring to your comment "20:11, 25 May 2012 (diff | hist) . . (-53)‎ . . Armageddon (MUD) ‎ (Undid revision 494356603 by 68.80.95.140 (talk) link is specifically excluded by WP:ELNO #11, and you can seriously fuck off with your "deface" bullshit) (top)". Thanks, and have a nice Memorial Day weekend. 68.80.95.140 (talk) 20:28, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Don't engage in bullshit behavior and your behavior won't get called bullshit. Referring to someone keeping your pathetic linkspam out of a page, in compliance with Wikipedia policy, as "defacing" the page is serious bullshit. I know you think that, because you've seen Wikipedia muckity-muck people talking in a prissy officious tone like you're using, that means you'll get your way if you push that tone hard enough, especially since I have (gasp!) used profanity, but this is cargo cult behavior on your part; sticking feathers in your ass does not make you a chicken. As you might have guessed from my present demeanor, I am in a spectacularly irritable mood, so please, test me on this. It's an excellent day to set somebody on fire. —chaos5023 (talk) 21:44, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Chaos 5023, I'm not looking to pick a fight with you. I'm attempting to continue to improve the Armageddon MUD page. I understand that you have put a lot of time and effort into that page, and Wikipedia appreciates it, but my modifications are not an attack against you. Personal threats and cursing are completely unnecessary, and if we cannot come to an agreement about this then you may feel free to elevate the dispute to a higher level.68.80.95.140 (talk) 21:56, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

I took a look at the site you're trying to link to, and seriously, that's your story, that you're "attempting to continue to improve the page"? By linking to a hastily thrown-together, crap site whose only real content is a whiny hatchet job article the upshot of which is to promote one of Arm's competitors? You amaze me. Here I thought it was just a link to an inconsequential fansite, but actually you're attempting to use a Wikipedia article to promote a PR attack on its topic. Super classy, dude. —chaos5023 (talk) 23:08, 25 May 2012 (UTC)