User talk:CharlieEchoTango: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 22:10, 14 September 2012

Hello. Click here to leave a message.
Archives : 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9

I'm requesting that you reconsider your close of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gates of Vienna (2nd nomination) as delete. I believe that "no consensus" should have been called. I'm making this request per the DRV requirements. __meco (talk) 14:53, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

75% is consensus enough for me, but feel free to take to DRV if you disagree. Best, CharlieEchoTango (contact) 22:10, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:53, 14 September 2012 edit Meco (talk \| contribs) 53,690 edits →‎Your closing of AfD for Gates of Vienna: new section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 22:10, 14 September 2012 edit undo CharlieEchoTango (talk \| contribs) Rollbackers 14,035 edits re Next edit →
Line 8:		Line 8:

	I'm requesting that you reconsider your close of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gates of Vienna (2nd nomination)]] as delete. I believe that "no consensus" should have been called. I'm making this request per the DRV requirements. __[[User:Meco\|meco]] ([[User talk:Meco\|talk]]) 14:53, 14 September 2012 (UTC)		I'm requesting that you reconsider your close of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gates of Vienna (2nd nomination)]] as delete. I believe that "no consensus" should have been called. I'm making this request per the DRV requirements. __[[User:Meco\|meco]] ([[User talk:Meco\|talk]]) 14:53, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
			:75% is consensus enough for me, but feel free to take to DRV if you disagree. Best, ''CharlieEchoTango'' ([[User talk:CharlieEchoTango#top\|<span style="color:#0645AD;">contact</span>]]) 22:10, 14 September 2012 (UTC)