User talk:Kitteneatkitten: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I talked about this on the talk page of the article. The sources are not from libertarians. "Classical liberalism" is a very common term in political philosophy. Libertarians are from the only ones that use the term. You're unjustified in saying otherwise in the article. [[User:RJII|RJII]] 20:59, 3 May 2006 (UTC) |
I talked about this on the talk page of the article. The sources are not from libertarians. "Classical liberalism" is a very common term in political philosophy. Libertarians are from the only ones that use the term. You're unjustified in saying otherwise in the article. [[User:RJII|RJII]] 20:59, 3 May 2006 (UTC) |
||
==mediation== |
|||
I've taken this to mediation, since you expressed as desire to take it to arbitration. We can't go straight to arbitration without trying things like this first. See the mediation case here: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_mediation#Issues_to_be_mediated] {{RFM-Filed|Case name}} |
|||
[[User:RJII|RJII]] 23:37, 3 May 2006 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 23:37, 3 May 2006
I talked about this on the talk page of the article. The sources are not from libertarians. "Classical liberalism" is a very common term in political philosophy. Libertarians are from the only ones that use the term. You're unjustified in saying otherwise in the article. RJII 20:59, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
mediation
I've taken this to mediation, since you expressed as desire to take it to arbitration. We can't go straight to arbitration without trying things like this first. See the mediation case here: [1] Template:RFM-Filed