User talk:Skyring: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 23:34, 19 October 2012

Arbitrary heading

Hi mate, The Labor guys are doing a real number on Kathy Jackson over on her wiki page, specifically stuff from Independent Australia which is a blog written by a ex-Labor candidate. Though she may or may not be involved in this mess the sort of accusations that are being made seem to be just are covering Craig Thomson. I've tried editing the article to remove the offending info and pointing the HSU affair stuff back to the main HSU Affairs article but unfortunately, surprise surprise, it's entered edit war territory.

Wondering if you can help out as I am a newbie when it comes to using all the functions of wikipedia. Thanks. You can see the edits that I have made which seems reasonable compared to how locked down the CT pages are. Crocodile2009 (talk) 12:23, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No answers

I don't know why they feel they can get away with it .. http://conservativeweasel.blogspot.com.au/2012/10/when-wiki-editors-abuse.html If I can help, and if you want me to delete it .. DDB (talk) 21:12, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. HiLo's behaviour, regardless of political opinion, goes well beyond the bounds of what is expected of a Wikipedia editor. I'm putting together a page of evidence to show that this is a long-standing issue and he has gotten away with it for too long. If he cannot see in his own heart that this is unacceptable, then he needs to be steered in a better direction by the wider community. --Pete (talk) 23:33, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 |archive = User talk:Skyring/Archive %(counter)d
 }}
+==Arbitrary heading==
 Hi mate,
 The Labor guys are doing a real number on Kathy Jackson over on her wiki page, specifically stuff from Independent Australia which is a blog written by a ex-Labor candidate. Though she may or may not be involved in this mess the sort of accusations that are being made seem to be just are covering Craig Thomson. I've tried editing the article to remove the offending info and pointing the HSU affair stuff back to the main HSU Affairs article but unfortunately, surprise surprise, it's entered edit war territory.
 Wondering if you can help out as I am a newbie when it comes to using all the functions of wikipedia. Thanks. You can see the edits that I have made which seems reasonable compared to how locked down the CT pages are. [[User:Crocodile2009|Crocodile2009]] ([[User talk:Crocodile2009|talk]]) 12:23, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
 == No answers ==
 I don't know why they feel they can get away with it .. http://conservativeweasel.blogspot.com.au/2012/10/when-wiki-editors-abuse.html If I can help, and if you want me to delete it .. [[User:Ddball|DDB]] ([[User talk:Ddball|talk]]) 21:12, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
+:Thanks. HiLo's behaviour, regardless of political opinion, goes well beyond the bounds of what is expected of a Wikipedia editor. I'm putting together a [[User:Skyring/RFCU evidence|page of evidence]] to show that this is a long-standing issue and he has gotten away with it for too long. If he cannot see in his own heart that this is unacceptable, then he needs to be steered in a better direction by the wider community. --[[User:Skyring|Pete]] ([[User talk:Skyring#top|talk]]) 23:33, 19 October 2012 (UTC)