User talk:Gdandsnahb

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because you have made it clear that you have no intention of cooperating, and of persistent deliberate disruption. In addition to the type of disruptive editing which led to your previous blocks, you have taken to deliberate disruption in retaliation to actions which you dislike. For example, this edit was clearly deliberately disruptive, with an absurd edit summary that you can only have intended as provocation. There are other edits which clearly serve the same purpose. You have also openly declared your intention of being disruptive, as for example here, and further indications of your attitudes and intentions are here, here, and here. You may have started out intending to edit in good faith in what you personally thought was a constructive way, but been unwilling to edit collaboratively and accept policies and guidelines. However, your editing has now become outright vandalism. In one of the edits I have linked to above, you expressed the hope that you could "waste more of [our] time in the future". Well, you can be happy to know that you have done that for a little while, but you have now wasted enough of our time, and it's time to say goodbye. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:22, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

I'm actually dying of laughter. A french source on an english encyclopedia is really verifiable for the reader, right? hahaha! It's not outright vandalism when you're both completely wrong. I plan to see you and your friends very soon. I meant it when I said I plan to waste more of your time in the future, I'm not going to be pushed around by a bunch of fifty year old trolls who fell off their rocker. A sincere fuck you and talk you soon. --Gdandsnahb (talk) 15:55, 21 November 2012 (UTC)