User talk:Astynax: Difference between revisions
MarshalN20 (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
Notwithstanding the apparent disagreements we have over the content of certain articles, it would be helpful if you (and Lecen) could please stop referring to Nazis and Adolf Hitler when developing an argument. Even if Cambalachero's sources are from individuals with political views in favor of fascism, which from my perspective do not discredit them (per [[ad hominem]]), that does not make them Nazis. Moreover, all insinuations of me (or Cambalachero) being partisans to such a political viewpoint (fascist or Nazi) should also be avoided, for the sake of ''Wikiquette'' (added that I doubt any of us has ever declared partisanship to such viewpoints). Best regards.--[[User:MarshalN20|<span style="color:maroon">'''MarshalN20'''</span>]] | [[User_talk:MarshalN20|<sup><font color="Olive">'''T'''</font><font color="Silver">'''al'''</font><font color="Olive">'''k'''</font></sup>]] 18:34, 25 March 2013 (UTC) |
Notwithstanding the apparent disagreements we have over the content of certain articles, it would be helpful if you (and Lecen) could please stop referring to Nazis and Adolf Hitler when developing an argument. Even if Cambalachero's sources are from individuals with political views in favor of fascism, which from my perspective do not discredit them (per [[ad hominem]]), that does not make them Nazis. Moreover, all insinuations of me (or Cambalachero) being partisans to such a political viewpoint (fascist or Nazi) should also be avoided, for the sake of ''Wikiquette'' (added that I doubt any of us has ever declared partisanship to such viewpoints). Best regards.--[[User:MarshalN20|<span style="color:maroon">'''MarshalN20'''</span>]] | [[User_talk:MarshalN20|<sup><font color="Olive">'''T'''</font><font color="Silver">'''al'''</font><font color="Olive">'''k'''</font></sup>]] 18:34, 25 March 2013 (UTC) |
||
:As I noted in my comment, the illustration used was a "hypothetical" case, and nowhere did I say or insinuate that anyone (other than the fictional neo-nazi editor being used in the illustration) was pro-Nazi or Fascist. Even Lecen referred only to the revisionist writers as "Fascist", which is what they are called in the source material he cited. You need not take offense, as none was given. [[User:Astynax| • Astynax]] <sup>[[User talk:Astynax|<span style='color:#3399CC'>talk</span>]]</sup> 07:35, 27 March 2013 (UTC) |
:As I noted in my comment, the illustration used was a "hypothetical" case, and nowhere did I say or insinuate that anyone (other than the fictional neo-nazi editor being used in the illustration) was pro-Nazi or Fascist. Even Lecen referred only to the revisionist writers as "Fascist", which is what they are called in the source material he cited. You need not take offense, as none was given. [[User:Astynax| • Astynax]] <sup>[[User talk:Astynax|<span style='color:#3399CC'>talk</span>]]</sup> 07:35, 27 March 2013 (UTC) |
||
::In this diatribe by Lecen ([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk%3AArbitration%2FRequests&diff=546926806&oldid=546923572]), your buddy writes about the promotion of "a Fascist political agenda" by fascist editors. Within the context of the statement, he is clearly referring to Cambalachero and me. I can provide further diffs, if you desire, but the point here is not to exacerbate tensions. Regardless of your acceptance or denial of the facts, my comment is simply a friendly request for both Lecen (who has your page on watch & can view this statement) and you to stop these unfounded accusations. All the best.--[[User:MarshalN20|<span style="color:maroon">'''MarshalN20'''</span>]] | [[User_talk:MarshalN20|<sup><font color="Olive">'''T'''</font><font color="Silver">'''al'''</font><font color="Olive">'''k'''</font></sup>]] 00:38, 28 March 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== Portuguese invasion of the Eastern Bank (1811–1812) == |
== Portuguese invasion of the Eastern Bank (1811–1812) == |
Revision as of 00:38, 28 March 2013
This is Astynax's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17Auto-archiving period: 10 days ![]() |
Nazism
Dear Astynax,
Notwithstanding the apparent disagreements we have over the content of certain articles, it would be helpful if you (and Lecen) could please stop referring to Nazis and Adolf Hitler when developing an argument. Even if Cambalachero's sources are from individuals with political views in favor of fascism, which from my perspective do not discredit them (per ad hominem), that does not make them Nazis. Moreover, all insinuations of me (or Cambalachero) being partisans to such a political viewpoint (fascist or Nazi) should also be avoided, for the sake of Wikiquette (added that I doubt any of us has ever declared partisanship to such viewpoints). Best regards.--MarshalN20 | Talk 18:34, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
- As I noted in my comment, the illustration used was a "hypothetical" case, and nowhere did I say or insinuate that anyone (other than the fictional neo-nazi editor being used in the illustration) was pro-Nazi or Fascist. Even Lecen referred only to the revisionist writers as "Fascist", which is what they are called in the source material he cited. You need not take offense, as none was given. • Astynax talk 07:35, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- In this diatribe by Lecen ([1]), your buddy writes about the promotion of "a Fascist political agenda" by fascist editors. Within the context of the statement, he is clearly referring to Cambalachero and me. I can provide further diffs, if you desire, but the point here is not to exacerbate tensions. Regardless of your acceptance or denial of the facts, my comment is simply a friendly request for both Lecen (who has your page on watch & can view this statement) and you to stop these unfounded accusations. All the best.--MarshalN20 | Talk 00:38, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
Portuguese invasion of the Eastern Bank (1811–1812)
Good news here. I'm working on Portuguese invasion of the Eastern Bank (1811–1812). Would you be willing to help me out? I'm already done with the first three sections. I believe that the article will require three more sections to be completed. --Lecen (talk) 23:08, 27 March 2013 (UTC)