Egan-Jones Ratings Company: Difference between revisions

Edit links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Addbot (talk | contribs)
Bots
2,838,809 edits
m Bot: Migrating 1 interwiki links, now provided by Wikidata on d:q1296728
BoltonSM3 (talk | contribs)
121 edits
m Cleaned up using AutoEd
Line 7: Line 7:
| location_city = [[Haverford, Pennsylvania]]<ref>[http://www.powerprofiles.com/profile/00005158058443/EGAN+JONES+RATINGS-SALINE-MI EGAN JONES RATINGS]</ref>
| location_city = [[Haverford, Pennsylvania]]<ref>[http://www.powerprofiles.com/profile/00005158058443/EGAN+JONES+RATINGS-SALINE-MI EGAN JONES RATINGS]</ref>
| location_country = United States
| location_country = United States
| origins =
| origins =
| key_people = Sean Egan & Bruce Jones
| key_people = Sean Egan & Bruce Jones
| area_served = Global
| area_served = Global
| industry = [[Financial services]]
| industry = [[Financial services]]
| employees = 20<ref name=press-release1>{{cite web|title=Press Release|url=http://www.egan-jones.com/public/download/3076936_1.pdf|publisher=EGAN-JONES RATINGS COMPANY|accessdate=26 April 2012|archivedate=APRIL 19, 2012}}</ref>
| employees = 20<ref name=press-release1>{{cite web|title=Press Release|url=http://www.egan-jones.com/public/download/3076936_1.pdf|publisher=EGAN-JONES RATINGS COMPANY|accessdate=26 April 2012|archivedate=APRIL 19, 2012}}</ref>
| products =
| products =
| services =
| services =
| revenue =
| revenue =
| net_income =
| net_income =
| parent =
| parent =
| subsid =
| subsid =
| owner =
| owner =
| company_slogan =
| company_slogan =
| homepage = [http://www.egan-jones.com/ www.egan-jones.com]
| homepage = [http://www.egan-jones.com/ www.egan-jones.com]
Line 29: Line 29:


Sean Egan, principal of Egan-Jones Rating, appeared before Congress on October 22, 2008 and argued that issuers of complex securities "shopped" for ratings which resulted in a [[race to the bottom]] in terms of credit transparency. Rather than "beat up [[Moody's Investors Service|Moody's]] and [[Standard & Poor's|S&P]] for behavior" they'd been financially motivated to pursue, the government needs to support a new [[business model]] paid for by investors, not issuers, to support the funding ecosystem which has so severely broken down, he asserted.<ref>[https://house.resource.org/110/org.c-span.281924-1.pdf Congressional Record, Oct 22, 2008]</ref>
Sean Egan, principal of Egan-Jones Rating, appeared before Congress on October 22, 2008 and argued that issuers of complex securities "shopped" for ratings which resulted in a [[race to the bottom]] in terms of credit transparency. Rather than "beat up [[Moody's Investors Service|Moody's]] and [[Standard & Poor's|S&P]] for behavior" they'd been financially motivated to pursue, the government needs to support a new [[business model]] paid for by investors, not issuers, to support the funding ecosystem which has so severely broken down, he asserted.<ref>[https://house.resource.org/110/org.c-span.281924-1.pdf Congressional Record, Oct 22, 2008]</ref>
Egan-Jones on July 16, 2011, became the first [[NRSRO]] to cut its rating on the United States from AAA to AA+.<ref>[http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-07-18/egan-jones-cuts-u-s-rating-to-aa-on-spending-cut-concern-1-.html Egan-Jones Cuts U.S. Rating to AA+ on Spending-Cut Concern], Bloomberg (July 18, 2011).</ref>
Egan-Jones on July 16, 2011, became the first [[NRSRO]] to cut its rating on the United States from AAA to AA+.<ref>[http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-07-18/egan-jones-cuts-u-s-rating-to-aa-on-spending-cut-concern-1-.html Egan-Jones Cuts U.S. Rating to AA+ on Spending-Cut Concern], Bloomberg (July 18, 2011).</ref><ref>{{cite web|last=Larry|first=Klein|title=Dispute your Credit|url=http://www.disputeyourcreditreport.us|accessdate=26 April 2013}}</ref>
On April 5 2012, Egan-Jones downgraded the credit ranking of the United States for the second time (and within one year) from AA+ (Excellent) to AA (Very Good) assuming that the debt will reach $16.7 trillion dollars by the end of 2012 while the GDP will not grow further $ 15,7 trillion dollar limit and the debt to the GDP ratio will reach 112% of the national GDP which is the highest level since the WW II.<ref name=Leong>{{cite news|last=Leong|first=Richard|title=Egan-Jones cuts U.S. rating on debt burden|url=http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/04/06/ratings-usa-egan-idUSL2E8F629N20120406|accessdate=14 September 2012|agency=Reuters|date=6 April 2012}}</ref> On September 14 2012, Egan-Jones downgraded the credit rating of the United States for the third time from AA to AA-, the lowest of what is considered "high grade", as a reaction to [[Quantitative easing#QE1.2C_QE2.2C_and_QE3|QE3]].<ref name=Detrixhe>{{cite news|last=Detrixhe|first=John|title=Egan-Jones Cuts U.S. Rating to AA- After Fed Adds to Stimulus|url=http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-09-14/egan-jones-cuts-u-s-rating-to-aa-after-fed-adds-to-stimulus.html|accessdate=14 September 2012|agency=Bloomberg|date=14 September 2012}}</ref>
On April 5 2012, Egan-Jones downgraded the credit ranking of the United States for the second time (and within one year) from AA+ (Excellent) to AA (Very Good) assuming that the debt will reach $16.7 trillion dollars by the end of 2012 while the GDP will not grow further $ 15,7 trillion dollar limit and the debt to the GDP ratio will reach 112% of the national GDP which is the highest level since the WW II.<ref name=Leong>{{cite news|last=Leong|first=Richard|title=Egan-Jones cuts U.S. rating on debt burden|url=http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/04/06/ratings-usa-egan-idUSL2E8F629N20120406|accessdate=14 September 2012|agency=Reuters|date=6 April 2012}}</ref> On September 14 2012, Egan-Jones downgraded the credit rating of the United States for the third time from AA to AA-, the lowest of what is considered "high grade", as a reaction to [[Quantitative easing#QE1, QE2, and QE3|QE3]].<ref name=Detrixhe>{{cite news|last=Detrixhe|first=John|title=Egan-Jones Cuts U.S. Rating to AA- After Fed Adds to Stimulus|url=http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-09-14/egan-jones-cuts-u-s-rating-to-aa-after-fed-adds-to-stimulus.html|accessdate=14 September 2012|agency=Bloomberg|date=14 September 2012}}</ref>


Egan-Jones was also the first to downgrade [[WorldCom]] and [[Enron]].<ref name=MacDonald1>{{cite news|last=MacDonald|first=Elizabeth|title=Egan-Jones to Fight Potential SEC Charges|url=http://www.foxbusiness.com/investing/2012/04/19/egan-jones-to-fight-potential-sec-charges/|accessdate=26 April 2012|newspaper=FoxBusiness|date=April 19, 2012}}</ref>
Egan-Jones was also the first to downgrade [[WorldCom]] and [[Enron]].<ref name=MacDonald1>{{cite news|last=MacDonald|first=Elizabeth|title=Egan-Jones to Fight Potential SEC Charges|url=http://www.foxbusiness.com/investing/2012/04/19/egan-jones-to-fight-potential-sec-charges/|accessdate=26 April 2012|newspaper=FoxBusiness|date=April 19, 2012}}</ref>


==2012 SEC charges==
==2012 SEC charges==
Line 41: Line 41:
===Egan-Jones response===
===Egan-Jones response===
{|class="toccolours" style="float: right; margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 2em; font-size: 85%; background:#c6dbf7; color:black; width:25em; max-width: 25%;" cellspacing="5"
{|class="toccolours" style="float: right; margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 2em; font-size: 85%; background:#c6dbf7; color:black; width:25em; max-width: 25%;" cellspacing="5"
|style="text-align: left;"|The material that we put down was accurate to the best of our ability. If we had to do it again today I’d say exactly the same thing.
|style="text-align: left;"|The material that we put down was accurate to the best of our ability. If we had to do it again today I’d say exactly the same thing.
|-
|-
|style="text-align: left;"|—Sean Egan, CEO, in an interview on [[CNBC]]<ref name=Abramowicz1>{{cite news|last=Abramowicz|first=Lisa|title=Egan-Jones Defends Credit Rating Business as SEC Weighs Charges|url=http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-04-19/egan-jones-defends-credit-rating-business-as-sec-weighs-charges.html|accessdate=26 April 2012|newspaper=Bloomberg|date=Apr 19, 2012}}</ref><ref name=Beller1>{{cite news|last=Beller|first=Margo D.|title=Sean Egan: No Basis for SEC to Accuse Ratings Firm|url=http://www.cnbc.com/id/47104927/|accessdate=26 April 2012|date=19 Apr 2012|publisher=CNBC}}</ref>
|style="text-align: left;"|—Sean Egan, CEO, in an interview on [[CNBC]]<ref name=Abramowicz1>{{cite news|last=Abramowicz|first=Lisa|title=Egan-Jones Defends Credit Rating Business as SEC Weighs Charges|url=http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-04-19/egan-jones-defends-credit-rating-business-as-sec-weighs-charges.html|accessdate=26 April 2012|newspaper=Bloomberg|date=Apr 19, 2012}}</ref><ref name=Beller1>{{cite news|last=Beller|first=Margo D.|title=Sean Egan: No Basis for SEC to Accuse Ratings Firm|url=http://www.cnbc.com/id/47104927/|accessdate=26 April 2012|date=19 Apr 2012|publisher=CNBC}}</ref>
|}
|}
Egan has stated, "Our job is to get back to work and focus on providing timely, accurate ratings and research. This will not have any effect on the firm's independence or our commitment to call credit quality as we see it, regardless of issuer."<ref name=Bases1>{{cite news|last=Bases|first=Daniel|title=Egan-Jones: SEC probe will not affect ratings independence|url=http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/04/23/eganjones-sec-idUSL2E8FNBSN20120423|accessdate=26 April 2012|date=Apr 23, 2012|author2=Luciana Lopez|publisher=Reuters}}</ref> [[Alan Futerfas]], the firms lawyer, has denied the allegations stating that "it’s clear the SEC has a bias against independent firms" noting that the SEC was using "hyper-technical" claims and that "these filings, new forms started in 2007, are subject to significant interpretation," and that "the firm used good faith and answered [questions on the forms] as best as it could."<ref name=Fontevecchia1>{{cite news|last=Fontevecchia|first=Agustino|title=Egan-Jones' Lawyer Accuses SEC Of Bias Against Independent Firms|url=http://www.forbes.com/sites/afontevecchia/2012/04/24/egan-jones-lawyer-accuses-sec-of-bias-against-independent-firms/|accessdate=26 April 2012|newspaper=Forbes|date=4/24/2012}}</ref> Futerfas noted that "not one word in the [SEC's order] questions the quality, integrity and timeliness of the Egan-Jones ratings" and criticized the SEC for failing to take action against major NSROs which had "inflated their structured debt, rated junk AAA, and brought down the American economy, according to Congressional reports."<ref name=Fontevecchia1/><ref name=ap1>{{cite news|title=SEC accuses Egan-Jones of making false statements|url=http://www.cnbc.com/id/47162918|accessdate=26 April 2012|newspaper=Associated Press|date=24 Apr 2012}}</ref> The SEC has not responded to Futerfas's remarks.
Egan has stated, "Our job is to get back to work and focus on providing timely, accurate ratings and research. This will not have any effect on the firm's independence or our commitment to call credit quality as we see it, regardless of issuer."<ref name=Bases1>{{cite news|last=Bases|first=Daniel|title=Egan-Jones: SEC probe will not affect ratings independence|url=http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/04/23/eganjones-sec-idUSL2E8FNBSN20120423|accessdate=26 April 2012|date=Apr 23, 2012|author2=Luciana Lopez|publisher=Reuters}}</ref> [[Alan Futerfas]], the firms lawyer, has denied the allegations stating that "it’s clear the SEC has a bias against independent firms" noting that the SEC was using "hyper-technical" claims and that "these filings, new forms started in 2007, are subject to significant interpretation," and that "the firm used good faith and answered [questions on the forms] as best as it could."<ref name=Fontevecchia1>{{cite news|last=Fontevecchia|first=Agustino|title=Egan-Jones' Lawyer Accuses SEC Of Bias Against Independent Firms|url=http://www.forbes.com/sites/afontevecchia/2012/04/24/egan-jones-lawyer-accuses-sec-of-bias-against-independent-firms/|accessdate=26 April 2012|newspaper=Forbes|date=4/24/2012}}</ref> Futerfas noted that "not one word in the [SEC's order] questions the quality, integrity and timeliness of the Egan-Jones ratings" and criticized the SEC for failing to take action against major NSROs which had "inflated their structured debt, rated junk AAA, and brought down the American economy, according to Congressional reports."<ref name=Fontevecchia1/><ref name=ap1>{{cite news|title=SEC accuses Egan-Jones of making false statements|url=http://www.cnbc.com/id/47162918|accessdate=26 April 2012|newspaper=Associated Press|date=24 Apr 2012}}</ref> The SEC has not responded to Futerfas's remarks.
Line 62: Line 62:
| video1 = [http://video.cnbc.com/gallery/?video=3000085240&play=1 Sean Egan on Potential SEC Charges], [[CNBC]]
| video1 = [http://video.cnbc.com/gallery/?video=3000085240&play=1 Sean Egan on Potential SEC Charges], [[CNBC]]
}}
}}
*[http://www.egan-jones.com/ Official website]
* [http://www.egan-jones.com/ Official website]
*[http://www.egan-jones.com/public/download/3076936_1.pdf Press Release responding to SEC charges], April 19, 2012
* [http://www.egan-jones.com/public/download/3076936_1.pdf Press Release responding to SEC charges], April 19, 2012


{{NRSRO}}
{{NRSRO}}

Revision as of 05:29, 26 April 2013

Egan-Jones Ratings Company
Company typePrivate company
IndustryFinancial services
Founded1995
FounderSean Egan & Bruce Jones
Headquarters
Haverford, Pennsylvania[1]
,
United States
Area served
Global
Key people
Sean Egan & Bruce Jones
Websitewww.egan-jones.com

Egan-Jones Ratings Company, also known as EJR, was founded in 1995 and actively rates the credit worthiness of approximately 2000+ high yield and high grade U.S. corporate debt issuers. Egan-Jones positions itself as unique among nationally recognized statistical rating organizations (NRSROs) for being wholly investor-supported, a structure designed to minimize the potential for conflicts of interest in assessing credit quality[citation needed]. The firm was granted NRSRO status on December 21, 2007, making it the ninth such organization to be recognized by the SEC[citation needed].

The effectiveness of Egan-Jones' investor-supported credit ratings has been measured by third parties, including Richard D. Johnson of the Kansas City Federal Reserve, the Stanford University Business School and the University of Michigan's Business School.[3]

Sean Egan, principal of Egan-Jones Rating, appeared before Congress on October 22, 2008 and argued that issuers of complex securities "shopped" for ratings which resulted in a race to the bottom in terms of credit transparency. Rather than "beat up Moody's and S&P for behavior" they'd been financially motivated to pursue, the government needs to support a new business model paid for by investors, not issuers, to support the funding ecosystem which has so severely broken down, he asserted.[4] Egan-Jones on July 16, 2011, became the first NRSRO to cut its rating on the United States from AAA to AA+.[5][6] On April 5 2012, Egan-Jones downgraded the credit ranking of the United States for the second time (and within one year) from AA+ (Excellent) to AA (Very Good) assuming that the debt will reach $16.7 trillion dollars by the end of 2012 while the GDP will not grow further $ 15,7 trillion dollar limit and the debt to the GDP ratio will reach 112% of the national GDP which is the highest level since the WW II.[7] On September 14 2012, Egan-Jones downgraded the credit rating of the United States for the third time from AA to AA-, the lowest of what is considered "high grade", as a reaction to QE3.[8]

Egan-Jones was also the first to downgrade WorldCom and Enron.[9]

2012 SEC charges

Charges

The SEC warned Egan-Jones in October 2011 of a possible enforcement action.[10] On April 24, 2012, the SEC charged Sean Egan with numerous offenses including: making false and misleading statements in the firm's application to become a Nationally Recognized Rating Agency, violations of conflicts-of-interest and record keeping, and falsely stating that he was unaware if his paid clients were long or short specific securities that Egan-Jones rated. The Securities and Exchange Commission issued charges against the company, and its founder, Sean Egan, for "material misrepresentations and omissions in the company’s July 2008 application to register as a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (NRSRO) for issuers of asset-backed securities (ABS) and government securities" as well as "material misrepresentations in other submissions furnished to the SEC and violations of record-keeping and conflict-of-interest provisions governing NRSROs."[11] The SEC alleged that among other violations EJR "allowed two analysts to participate in determining the credit ratings for issuers whose securities they owned", and "EJR also (1) failed to make or retain a record of the procedures and methodologies it used to determine credit ratings". [12]

Egan-Jones response

The material that we put down was accurate to the best of our ability. If we had to do it again today I’d say exactly the same thing.
—Sean Egan, CEO, in an interview on CNBC[13][14]

Egan has stated, "Our job is to get back to work and focus on providing timely, accurate ratings and research. This will not have any effect on the firm's independence or our commitment to call credit quality as we see it, regardless of issuer."[15] Alan Futerfas, the firms lawyer, has denied the allegations stating that "it’s clear the SEC has a bias against independent firms" noting that the SEC was using "hyper-technical" claims and that "these filings, new forms started in 2007, are subject to significant interpretation," and that "the firm used good faith and answered [questions on the forms] as best as it could."[16] Futerfas noted that "not one word in the [SEC's order] questions the quality, integrity and timeliness of the Egan-Jones ratings" and criticized the SEC for failing to take action against major NSROs which had "inflated their structured debt, rated junk AAA, and brought down the American economy, according to Congressional reports."[16][17] The SEC has not responded to Futerfas's remarks.

Settlement

The SEC announced that Egan-Jones has agreed to settle charges that they made willful and material misstatements and omissions when registering to become a NRSRO for asset-backed and government securities. Under the terms of the agreement, the firm is barred from rating government and asset-backed securities as a NRSRO for at least 18 months.[18]

Ratings

References

  1. ^ EGAN JONES RATINGS
  2. ^ "Press Release" (PDF). EGAN-JONES RATINGS COMPANY. Retrieved 26 April 2012. {{cite web}}: |archive-date= requires |archive-url= (help); Check date values in: |archivedate= (help)
  3. ^ Studies
  4. ^ Congressional Record, Oct 22, 2008
  5. ^ Egan-Jones Cuts U.S. Rating to AA+ on Spending-Cut Concern, Bloomberg (July 18, 2011).
  6. ^ Larry, Klein. "Dispute your Credit". Retrieved 26 April 2013.
  7. ^ Leong, Richard (6 April 2012). "Egan-Jones cuts U.S. rating on debt burden". Reuters. Retrieved 14 September 2012.
  8. ^ Detrixhe, John (14 September 2012). "Egan-Jones Cuts U.S. Rating to AA- After Fed Adds to Stimulus". Bloomberg. Retrieved 14 September 2012.
  9. ^ MacDonald, Elizabeth (April 19, 2012). "Egan-Jones to Fight Potential SEC Charges". FoxBusiness. Retrieved 26 April 2012.
  10. ^ NEUMANN, JEANNETTE (April 24, 2012). "SEC Charges Egan-Jones, Says Firm Exaggerated Its Expertise". WSJ. Retrieved 26 April 2012.
  11. ^ "Egan-Jones Ratings Co. and Sean Egan Charged with Making Material Misrepresentations to SEC". U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. April 24, 2012. Retrieved 26 April 2012.
  12. ^ http://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2012/34-66854.pdf
  13. ^ Abramowicz, Lisa (Apr 19, 2012). "Egan-Jones Defends Credit Rating Business as SEC Weighs Charges". Bloomberg. Retrieved 26 April 2012.
  14. ^ Beller, Margo D. (19 Apr 2012). "Sean Egan: No Basis for SEC to Accuse Ratings Firm". CNBC. Retrieved 26 April 2012.
  15. ^ Bases, Daniel; Luciana Lopez (Apr 23, 2012). "Egan-Jones: SEC probe will not affect ratings independence". Reuters. Retrieved 26 April 2012.
  16. ^ a b Fontevecchia, Agustino (4/24/2012). "Egan-Jones' Lawyer Accuses SEC Of Bias Against Independent Firms". Forbes. Retrieved 26 April 2012. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  17. ^ "SEC accuses Egan-Jones of making false statements". Associated Press. 24 Apr 2012. Retrieved 26 April 2012.
  18. ^ "Egan-Jones and Founder Sean Egan Agree to 18-Month Bars from Rating Asset-Backed and Government Securities Issuers as NRSRO". January 22, 2013. Retrieved 18 February 2013.

External links

External videos
video icon Sean Egan on Potential SEC Charges, CNBC
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Egan-Jones_Ratings_Company&oldid=552230609"