User talk:Allalone89

Have done some spring cleaning, good as new :D

Please stop

Please stop making requests on my talk page. You know what an unreliable source is and I will not be removing the entry. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:50, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

There are many definitions of what a "unreliable source" is, a very broad range. The only issue I see is that the link is not relevant to a majority of articles, that's all. You labeling the entire website as "unreliable" is unjustifiable. Let me ask you something and I expect a reasonable answer, why is your "personal website" allowed to be linked within articles yet others are not? Id accept either 2 of the following outcomes, you either add your site to the list, or remove mine. As simple as that.

Cutajarc (talk) 02:32, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia has specific definitions of what constitutes a reliable source, and your website fails to meet them. It is therefore an unreliable source for the purpose of my user page. In your time here you have used multiple IPs to restore your site to articles on multiple occasions and you have harassed me on my talkpage. I am no longer interested in engaging with you, so please stay away from my user pages. --AussieLegend (✉) 03:54, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

No information in any article was being based on my link, it was merely an external link with related information. Anyway the link is no longer located within any pages (ive given up with the discussuon as youre unfairly stubborn), those 145. ips where by me and you know why I did it, because our discussion wasnt even finalised and ShiftChange was already taking action. No it wasnt me that harrased your talk page. I was never interested in engaging with you as your unfriendly and arrogant. I want all ties cut with Wikipedia, its editors and especially you but I cant completely cut my self off until you remove the link from your list. I promise you will never hear from me again after that, EVER.

Cutajarc (talk) 04:33, 27 May 2013 (UTC)