User talk:Neotarf: Difference between revisions
→Signpost reports: sig |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
:Done. [[User:Neotarf|Neotarf]] ([[User talk:Neotarf#top|talk]]) 09:07, 21 June 2013 (UTC) |
:Done. [[User:Neotarf|Neotarf]] ([[User talk:Neotarf#top|talk]]) 09:07, 21 June 2013 (UTC) |
||
==Retired== |
|||
The retired banner is only for those never planning on editing again, anywhere, for any reason. There are no exceptions. If there are any plans of editing, or if there is ever the urge to make an edit anywhere, the semi-retired banner is more appropriate. [[User:Apteva|Apteva]] ([[User talk:Apteva|talk]]) 15:02, 2 July 2013 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 15:02, 2 July 2013
Arb report
Hello, as an avid copyeditor of the Signpost, I just wanted to say that you're doing a great job on the arbitration report. Your detailed but readable distillations of the goings-on in ArbCom are very helpful for those who don't follow the committee closely. Graham87 15:50, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
Signpost reports
Thanks for working on the Arbitration reports. I miss them when we don't have them.
Jarry is stepping down from writing the Tech report. I gave him a Signpost barnstar. Will you sign it with me?. Thanks, --Pine✉ 06:34, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
Retired
The retired banner is only for those never planning on editing again, anywhere, for any reason. There are no exceptions. If there are any plans of editing, or if there is ever the urge to make an edit anywhere, the semi-retired banner is more appropriate. Apteva (talk) 15:02, 2 July 2013 (UTC)