Jump to content

Declaration on the Name and Status of the Croatian Literary Language: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
The list of signatories would be nice to have
Page?
Line 14: Line 14:


This document addressed the [[Sabor]] of [[SR Croatia]] and the Assembly of [[Yugoslavia|SFR Yugoslavia]], stating:
This document addressed the [[Sabor]] of [[SR Croatia]] and the Assembly of [[Yugoslavia|SFR Yugoslavia]], stating:
{{quote|In the state administrative system, in the means of public and mass-communications, as well as in the language of the federal army, federal governing bodies, legislature, diplomacy and political organizations the Croatian language is being pushed out and brought into unequal position, into the level of province speech, through the imposing of a "state language" <nowiki>[</nowiki>[[Serbo-Croatian language|Serbo-Croatian]]<nowiki>]</nowiki>.<ref name="Kacic">[[Miro Kačić]], ''Jezikoslovna promišljanja''</ref>}}
{{quote|In the state administrative system, in the means of public and mass-communications, as well as in the language of the federal army, federal governing bodies, legislature, diplomacy and political organizations the Croatian language is being pushed out and brought into unequal position, into the level of province speech, through the imposing of a "state language" <nowiki>[</nowiki>[[Serbo-Croatian language|Serbo-Croatian]]<nowiki>]</nowiki>.<ref name="Kacic">{{cite book|author=[[Miro Kačić]]|title=Jezikoslovna promišljanja|year=2001|language=Croatian|publisher=Pergamena|location=Zagreb}}</ref>{{page needed}}

The declaration prompted [[Pavle Ivić]] to respond with his 1971 monograph ''Srpski narod i njegov jezik'' ("The Serbian People and Their Language").<ref>{{cite journal |title=Language Politics in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia: The Crisis over the Future of Serbian |author=Robert D. Greenberg |journal=Slavic Review |volume=59 |issue=3 |year=2000 |pages=625–640 |jstor=2697348}}</ref> The signers of the declaration demanded the equality of the four Yugoslav languages and the use of the Croatian literary language in schools and media. State authorities were accused of imposing of Serbian as official language. A unitarianist trend was strongest in the language area, but resistance to that policy was evident.
The declaration prompted [[Pavle Ivić]] to respond with his 1971 monograph ''Srpski narod i njegov jezik'' ("The Serbian People and Their Language").<ref>{{cite journal |title=Language Politics in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia: The Crisis over the Future of Serbian |author=Robert D. Greenberg |journal=Slavic Review |volume=59 |issue=3 |year=2000 |pages=625–640 |jstor=2697348}}</ref> The signers of the declaration demanded the equality of the four Yugoslav languages and the use of the Croatian literary language in schools and media. State authorities were accused of imposing of Serbian as official language. A unitarianist trend was strongest in the language area, but resistance to that policy was evident.
{{quote|Yugounitarists, especially those of Croat origin, and Greater Serbian elements, comprehended that theirs final goal was essentially endangered and that Croat linguistic mutiny must be energically broken. The force and drasticity of reaction had a goal of intimidation and breaking of moral; yugounitarists wanted to create the atmosphere of apathy and lowness of spirits among Croat masses and intellectuals, even bigger one than it existed before the Declaration... (...) The declaration proved that the [[Novi Sad agreement]] was a house of cards.|[[Dalibor Brozović]]|<ref name="Kacic" />}}
{{quote|Yugounitarists, especially those of Croat origin, and Greater Serbian elements, comprehended that theirs final goal was essentially endangered and that Croat linguistic mutiny must be energically broken. The force and drasticity of reaction had a goal of intimidation and breaking of moral; yugounitarists wanted to create the atmosphere of apathy and lowness of spirits among Croat masses and intellectuals, even bigger one than it existed before the Declaration... (...) The declaration proved that the [[Novi Sad agreement]] was a house of cards.|[[Dalibor Brozović]]|<ref name="Kacic" />{{page needed}}}}
The demands were rejected, and the [[Croatian Spring]] (MASPOK) movement was stopped. However, the Declaration were taken into consideration in the new [[1974 Yugoslav Constitution|Yugoslav constitution of 1974]]. Nearly all requests were granted in the formulation, and remained in effect until the [[breakup of Yugoslavia]]. On occasion of the publication’s 45th anniversary, the Croatian weekly journal Forum published the Declaration again in 2012, accompanied by a critical analysis.<ref>{{cite news |first= |last= |title=SOS ili tek alibi za nasilje nad jezikom |trans_title= SOS or nothing but an alibi for violence against language |url= http://bib.irb.hr/datoteka/578565.O_Deklaraciji_Forum.jpg |language=Croatian |location=Zagreb |publisher= [http://www.forum.tm/ ''Forum''] |date=16 March 2012 |pages= 38–39 |issn= 1848-204X |archivedate=7 July 2012 |deadurl=no|archiveurl=http://www.webcitation.org/68yT7x9My |accessdate=29 July 2012 }}</ref>
The demands were rejected, and the [[Croatian Spring]] (MASPOK) movement was stopped. However, the Declaration were taken into consideration in the new [[1974 Yugoslav Constitution|Yugoslav constitution of 1974]]. Nearly all requests were granted in the formulation, and remained in effect until the [[breakup of Yugoslavia]]. On occasion of the publication’s 45th anniversary, the Croatian weekly journal Forum published the Declaration again in 2012, accompanied by a critical analysis.<ref>{{cite news |first= |last= |title=SOS ili tek alibi za nasilje nad jezikom |trans_title= SOS or nothing but an alibi for violence against language |url= http://bib.irb.hr/datoteka/578565.O_Deklaraciji_Forum.jpg |language=Croatian |location=Zagreb |publisher= [http://www.forum.tm/ ''Forum''] |date=16 March 2012 |pages= 38–39 |issn= 1848-204X |archivedate=7 July 2012 |deadurl=no|archiveurl=http://www.webcitation.org/68yT7x9My |accessdate=29 July 2012 }}</ref>
<!--
<!--

Revision as of 11:56, 21 August 2013

Declaration on the Status and Name of the Croatian Literary Language
The Declaration was published in the March 17, 1967 issue of Telegram.
CreatedMarch 17, 1967
LocationZagreb, SR Croatia,
SFR Yugoslavia
Author(s)elements of the Croatian intelligentsia

The Declaration on the Status and Name of the Croatian Literary Language (Template:Lang-hr) was a document brought by Croat scholars.[1] The declaration was published on March 13, 1967 in the Telegram, Yugoslav newspapers for social and cultural issues, nr. 359, 17 March 1967. It contributed significantly towards the conserving of the independence of the Croatian language inside the SFR Yugoslavia, because its demands were later granted by the Yugoslav authorities in 1974.

This document addressed the Sabor of SR Croatia and the Assembly of SFR Yugoslavia, stating: {{quote|In the state administrative system, in the means of public and mass-communications, as well as in the language of the federal army, federal governing bodies, legislature, diplomacy and political organizations the Croatian language is being pushed out and brought into unequal position, into the level of province speech, through the imposing of a "state language" [Serbo-Croatian].[2][page needed]

The declaration prompted Pavle Ivić to respond with his 1971 monograph Srpski narod i njegov jezik ("The Serbian People and Their Language").[3] The signers of the declaration demanded the equality of the four Yugoslav languages and the use of the Croatian literary language in schools and media. State authorities were accused of imposing of Serbian as official language. A unitarianist trend was strongest in the language area, but resistance to that policy was evident.

Yugounitarists, especially those of Croat origin, and Greater Serbian elements, comprehended that theirs final goal was essentially endangered and that Croat linguistic mutiny must be energically broken. The force and drasticity of reaction had a goal of intimidation and breaking of moral; yugounitarists wanted to create the atmosphere of apathy and lowness of spirits among Croat masses and intellectuals, even bigger one than it existed before the Declaration... (...) The declaration proved that the Novi Sad agreement was a house of cards.

The demands were rejected, and the Croatian Spring (MASPOK) movement was stopped. However, the Declaration were taken into consideration in the new Yugoslav constitution of 1974. Nearly all requests were granted in the formulation, and remained in effect until the breakup of Yugoslavia. On occasion of the publication’s 45th anniversary, the Croatian weekly journal Forum published the Declaration again in 2012, accompanied by a critical analysis.[4]

See also

Signatories

References

  1. ^ Gröschel, Bernhard (2009). Das Serbokroatische zwischen Linguistik und Politik. Lincom Studies in Slavic Linguistics 34 (in German). Munich: Lincom Europa. pp. 36–47. ISBN 978-3-929075-79-3. LCCN 2009473660. OCLC 428012015. OL 15295665W. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |trans_title= ignored (|trans-title= suggested) (help)
  2. ^ a b Miro Kačić (2001). Jezikoslovna promišljanja (in Croatian). Zagreb: Pergamena.
  3. ^ Robert D. Greenberg (2000). "Language Politics in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia: The Crisis over the Future of Serbian". Slavic Review. 59 (3): 625–640. JSTOR 2697348.
  4. ^ "SOS ili tek alibi za nasilje nad jezikom" (in Croatian). Zagreb: Forum. 16 March 2012. pp. 38–39. ISSN 1848-204X. Archived from the original on 7 July 2012. Retrieved 29 July 2012. {{cite news}}: External link in |publisher= (help); Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help); Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help); Unknown parameter |trans_title= ignored (|trans-title= suggested) (help)
  • Original text, Deklaracija o nazivu i položaju hrvatskog književnog jezika published in Telegram, "Yugoslav newspapers for social and cultural questions, nr. 359, 17 March 1967