User talk:Ceejayoz/Archive 2

Please click here to leave me a new message. If your message is urgent, feel free to e-mail me or contact me via AIM (screenname: ceejayoz).

Archives
through May 31, 2006

Dispute

Hello, thank you for your message. I have no idea about the procedure for the resolution of a dispute. I am busy for now, sorry. You should explain me why this user has deleted my article so many times with no conensus and why Wiki adminisrtator are here pretending that nothing is happening. Give me just one serious reason. Brian W 19:29, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

User_talk:Brian_G._Wilson#Re:_Dispute — ceejayoz ^talk 19:48, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

links for my personal reference: Talk:Club music, Talk:House_music, Electronic_dance history, etc.

I'm less guilty than him, becouse I was trying to contribute to an existing article, those guys instead are aiming to destroy, without asking other users' opinion. Also, today my user page has been vandalized by an anonimous user. Stating that an exagerated eurocentrism is a nazi attitude is not the same as " guy, your a fucking nazi "... No, I'm not innocent, but my reactions can be understood.Brian W 20:03, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

User_talk:Brian_G._Wilson#Re:_Dispute — ceejayoz ^talk 20:16, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Disputes

I'm sorry ceejayoz. I wasn't referring to the article as "my article" and "Brian's". I'm sorry for the inconvienence. I just want all this to end, and for everyone else to stop getting angry over nothing. All we should do is get some experts and settle it. Again I'm sorry if I've caused any confusion. Hope to make up to you in the future.

By this I refer to the talk page for Kiand.

The Ronin 00:20, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

featured article dispute

Do u enjoy looking at peoples medical deseases, because many other people do not and would not wish to see them, think about other people on this topic --Andy 11:45, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

User_talk:Swainstonation#Re:_featured_article_dispute — ceejayoz ^talk 01:05, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Republicans arent grusome first of all,second of all i can just use the toolbox button to sign my posts, and third of all i never said to censor wikipedia, i just dont want people to think wikipedia is a website based on shock value rather than facts and if that is the first thing they see when they come to this website than there going to get the idea that wikipedia is here to disgust people--Andy 02:34, 6 June 2006 (UTC) immature sig spam removed — ceejayoz ^talk 02:47, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

User_talk:Swainstonation#Re:_featured_article_dispute — ceejayoz ^talk 02:49, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

do u allow vandals to do what they do? --Andy 11:45, 6 June 2006 (UTC):Huh? — ceejayoz ^talk 02:51, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

DO u alloew vandals to vandalize a page or do u revert back to the way it was before?--Andy 02:54, 6 June 2006 (UTC

NO u "censor" there opinion of the page and revert, or u revert/ ban the vandal or person making the attacks it when someone is making personal attackes "censoring" their opinion , so wikipedia is censored and your part of the problem--Andy 03:05, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Reverting vandalism is not censorship. Vandalism is itself censorship, as it generally removes legitimate data. — ceejayoz ^talk 11:12, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

• how is vandalism censorship, and i bet more than half the stuff on this website is not legit anyway, even if it is on the talk pages u remove it, that is vandalism --Andy 11:44, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

how is it immature, cuz u lost and u dont want to deal with me--Andy 12:20, 6 June 2006 (UTC)