Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Meeples10/School1st: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Demiurge1000 (talk | contribs) keep |
r |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
*As for my own opinion, I'm going with '''Keep'''. This appears to be a sandbox page for testing various code uses, not a blog, and the user's edits outside of their userspace, while very minimal, do not appear to be destructive.[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?limit=50&tagfilter=&title=Special%3AContributions&contribs=user&target=Meeples10&namespace=2&nsInvert=1&tagfilter=&year=2013&month=-1 ] This is at the very least a premature nomination, seeing as the account in question is under a week old. --[[User:erachima|erachima]] <small>[[User talk:erachima|talk]]</small> 02:31, 15 September 2013 (UTC) |
*As for my own opinion, I'm going with '''Keep'''. This appears to be a sandbox page for testing various code uses, not a blog, and the user's edits outside of their userspace, while very minimal, do not appear to be destructive.[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?limit=50&tagfilter=&title=Special%3AContributions&contribs=user&target=Meeples10&namespace=2&nsInvert=1&tagfilter=&year=2013&month=-1 ] This is at the very least a premature nomination, seeing as the account in question is under a week old. --[[User:erachima|erachima]] <small>[[User talk:erachima|talk]]</small> 02:31, 15 September 2013 (UTC) |
||
::Do you have any policy-based reasons for that !vote? It seems to be very clearly the use of wikipedia for the purposes of some 'test', clearly outside of the mission of this project - can you explain why it is not? |
|||
*'''Keep''' - come back in a year if the page still seems to threaten the order of the world. --[[User:Demiurge1000|Demiurge1000]] ([[User_talk:Demiurge1000|talk]]) 03:27, 15 September 2013 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' - come back in a year if the page still seems to threaten the order of the world. --[[User:Demiurge1000|Demiurge1000]] ([[User_talk:Demiurge1000|talk]]) 03:27, 15 September 2013 (UTC) |
||
:Got any policy to support that, demi, or just spouting unsupported opinion? [[Special:Contributions/88.104.27.75|88.104.27.75]] ([[User talk:88.104.27.75|talk]]) 03:43, 15 September 2013 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 03:43, 15 September 2013
User:Meeples10/School1st
On behalf of 88.104.27.75 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) --erachima talk 02:22, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- As for my own opinion, I'm going with Keep. This appears to be a sandbox page for testing various code uses, not a blog, and the user's edits outside of their userspace, while very minimal, do not appear to be destructive.[1] This is at the very least a premature nomination, seeing as the account in question is under a week old. --erachima talk 02:31, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- Do you have any policy-based reasons for that !vote? It seems to be very clearly the use of wikipedia for the purposes of some 'test', clearly outside of the mission of this project - can you explain why it is not?
- Keep - come back in a year if the page still seems to threaten the order of the world. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 03:27, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- Got any policy to support that, demi, or just spouting unsupported opinion? 88.104.27.75 (talk) 03:43, 15 September 2013 (UTC)