User talk:Pudgenet: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
See [[User_talk:Pudgenet/PerlJunk]] if you care. I don't. |
See [[User_talk:Pudgenet/PerlJunk]] if you care. I don't. |
||
==Special rights== |
|||
The page on special rights is under my mediation, something you have clearly indicated you won't tolerate. You were not part of that page prior to my involvement. You have not been involved in that issue prior to my involvement. Any involvement by you on that page would constitute [[Wikipedia:Wikistalking]]. You are not invited to participate in that page and if you continue to do so I will add wikistalking to the charges before the arb committee and ask for a ban during the trial. [[User:jbolden1517|jbolden1517]]<sup><font color="DarkGreen">[[User talk:jbolden1517|Talk]]</font></sup> 18:47, 11 June 2006 (UTC) |
|||
: Um. Wow. You're completely losing it. |
|||
: I edited your page, so it got added to my watchlist. I saw in your edit summary something about "special rights," which is a topic I am interested in (having just [http://slashdot.org/~pudge/journal/137118 posted recently about it on my journal]). So I went to the page, noticed some problems, and commented on them. |
|||
: This is not "stalking." I said nothing about you or the mediation process. I am not participating in your mediation. Since when does that mean I cannot discuss on the talk page? The mediation is taking place elsewhere. I do not have to be "invited" to participate on the discussion page, it is my right to participate there, and after I finish this edit, I will revert your inappropriate and unwarranted removal of my edit. |
|||
: Your insane conduct here is not helping your "case" against me. [[User:Pudgenet|Pudge]] 19:02, 11 June 2006 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 19:08, 11 June 2006
Write stuff here about how Pudge totally rules.
See User_talk:Pudgenet/PerlJunk if you care. I don't.
Special rights
The page on special rights is under my mediation, something you have clearly indicated you won't tolerate. You were not part of that page prior to my involvement. You have not been involved in that issue prior to my involvement. Any involvement by you on that page would constitute Wikipedia:Wikistalking. You are not invited to participate in that page and if you continue to do so I will add wikistalking to the charges before the arb committee and ask for a ban during the trial. jbolden1517Talk 18:47, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
- Um. Wow. You're completely losing it.
- I edited your page, so it got added to my watchlist. I saw in your edit summary something about "special rights," which is a topic I am interested in (having just posted recently about it on my journal). So I went to the page, noticed some problems, and commented on them.
- This is not "stalking." I said nothing about you or the mediation process. I am not participating in your mediation. Since when does that mean I cannot discuss on the talk page? The mediation is taking place elsewhere. I do not have to be "invited" to participate on the discussion page, it is my right to participate there, and after I finish this edit, I will revert your inappropriate and unwarranted removal of my edit.
- Your insane conduct here is not helping your "case" against me. Pudge 19:02, 11 June 2006 (UTC)