Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2013 December 15

15 December 2013

Anthony Holland (composer)

Anthony Holland (composer) (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (XfD|restore)

The page was about the Person Anthony Holland of Skidmore university. He was already known for his music and everyone was fine with that When his biopage got Royal Rife taged to it the page was deleted with in weeks. The Royal Rife page here is full of inconsistences and bad bias due to editors babysitting articles making sure that said articles never refelct information they oppose. Some of that same mob was there to destroy the Anthony Holland article for his efforts and scientific research. One admin even flat out stated on the talk page that the only reason they wanted the whole article deleted was because of the scientific experiment section.

Anthony Holland was of some notiblity for his music long before he began his scientific medical investigational experimentation. A particular mob obbsessed with shutting down that which they disagree with has removed a valuable article that only promised to get more interesting with age and additional content. 1zeroate (talk) 17:01, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

I am informed that I might want to provide links of notiblity. http://www.skidmore.edu/news/2013/111213-tedxskidmorecollege.php

TED speaker, http://www.thisamericanlife.org/radio-archives/episode/450/so-crazy-it-just-might-work this american life guest on NPR,

http://www.dramonline.org/albums/music-of-anthony-g-holland/notes started composing music at the age of ten, Played Carnigee Hall.

Further he has been on a few more TV shows regarding his science experiments and the guy pumps out music. It is his first passion. I can fill the page with music links to his compisitions.

All this is to say nothing of the fact that he is an associate professor of music, director of the College s electronic music facilities, and conductor of the Skidmore orchestra.

I want to stress that this is not my article it is just related to subject matter I maintain an interest in. That subject matter I waited to add to his bio for a long time out of fear of the Rife haters. I watched a wonderful well sourced article on royal raymond rife turn to total poorly sourced ruination. The article here on wikipedia that says it is a bio of Royal Rife is nothing but a dieatribe about the technology he pioneered and how bad for your health it is. No mention of his wives, his boats, his love of music, All that is cast asaide to playcate psudoskeptics and their desire to reject. Regardless of verifiablity. On that Rife page citations are repeated verbatum and obstinante editors still insist on more citation . Because a newpaper article with pictures needs a seperate citation of being a newspaper that took legitiment news pictures. ... Thats how bad the rife page is.

I did not want to see Anthony Hollands page go down in flames because of the fact that his research work is based of the old work of Royal Rife.

Novocure is a pad unit. Anthony Holland is working on a plasma attena broadcast method in the hopes of being able to acheive the same results as novocure only with out direct contact..

Whether or not the article is undeleted Mr Holland will continue on his path. He has his own Nonprofit medical research lab now. He named it novobiotronic in honor of Novocure who crossed the finishline of FDA legitimacy first. This is not an idle human that will only be remembered for screaming "leave brittiney alone" this is a major contributor to humanity in the grander scheme of things.

I sincerly hope to continue the editing of the man and the subjects of his life he persues. For the reprecussions of that life will hopefully improve us all. And thats something I think we should all want to help with. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1zeroate (talk

• temporarily restored for discussion here DGG ( talk ) 20:08, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Regarding Seppi333s request for a pubmed number. Although I read the MDres differnlty than you do I can understand what your asking for and I could of sworn he had a pilot study somewheres that ended poorly hence no need for phase one or two testing. All I can find are preclinical studies for Holland and his current research. On a related note however, I found many references of Novocures pubmed numbers. Upon inspection of the pubmed references it is made clear that the Novocure system utilzes electromagnetic fields to acheive their "tumor treatment fields"

This is rigoursly backed up and verified. http://www.novocure.com/clinical_trials.php?ID=1 So while I remain having trouble establishing something past pre-clinical for Holland spesifically , the type of research he is doing in said field of study has been independently verified. Low energy elecromagnetic emmison curing cancer. Many artilces will need to be readjusted in light of this medical acceptence of a frequency based therapy that is "tumor treatment fields" . Hopfully Anthony Holland will be the second one out to cross the finishline of Modern medical acceptence and practise. Novocure could use the compitetion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1zeroate (talk • contribs) 21:32, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

• Decision is out of scope of DRV per item 5 of "deletion review should not be used". ✄ (talk) 09:19, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

  DRV can be used to make any reasonable request--including pointing out that an argument did not get sufficient attention-- The fundamental rule is NOT BURO. Whether this particular request is reasonable or is being argued reasonably is another matter. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DGG (talk • contribs) 06:20, 18 December 2013

  Please don't cite your personal view of how DRV should work as though it were actual policy. If you want DRV to work differently, feel free to make a proposal (which I will vehemently oppose) and attempt to gather a consensus. It is long established that DRV is not a venue for users to get a "second bite of the cherry" by re-stating or expanding on the arguments already rejected at the AFD. Stifle (talk) 12:35, 18 December 2013 (UTC)