User talk:Exploding Boy

Please post new comments at the bottom of the page, and
please refrain from using extravagant signatures on this page

日本語

Archives 1 2 3 4

In recognition of your efforts in editing and removing unverified speculation from the Harry Potter pages, I hereby award you the Editor's Barnstar --Death

I award you this Editor's Barnstar for your work in dealing with the recent anti-gay trolls on homosexuality and related articles. Guanaco 03:49, 28 November 2005 (UTC)

I award you this barnstar for your persuasive arguments presented in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Opposition to homosexuality and for consistantly standing up to those who try to re-write Wikipedia to reflect their world view. ReformedCharacter 15:40, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

Tea names

Sorry for late, I answered you on my talk. --Aphaia 10:48, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

Request

Hey, I started this article a while ago, and it still needs a lot of work. I thought you might like to help. Pro-gay slogans and symbols. On a non-related note, as others said, I do think your username was quite amusing considering our last interaction a few minutes ago. The Ungovernable Force 05:21, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

Oddness

We keep ending up at the same articles at the same time; I wonder how that happens :-) --Julien Deveraux 05:22, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Hey, I know we have our differences when it comes to the whole sig thing, but I just wanted to say thanks that the whole picture fiasco at Ejaculation went civil and discussion went productively. Thanks again, and hopefully (since I won't be commmenting on the signature thing execpt for a final statemnet tomorrow) we can not hold our previous experience against each other once the dust settles. Later, ‹See Tfd›Chcknwnm (talk) —The preceding signature was simplified .

re: signature

Hi Exploding Boy, thanks for the note. Last I checked, lots of editors used images (some even several) in their signatures, and I did not know that it was against policy. I have removed it per your request (as you can see), and after reading the reasons for removal of unnecessary images. romarin [talk ] 20:31, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

Thanks!! Exploding Boy 01:48, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Watching Tattoo?

Not sure if you've kept an eye on it recently. A little flare out with a new editor trying to insert some anti-tattoo spin into the "health risks" section; not anything wildly false, but just at the level of "undue weight" and negative connotation. The editor, User:Doug rosenberg, has pissed me off a little bit, but it probably means I react too impatiently. So maybe I could borrow your wisdom, since you've made good edits there in the past. LotLE×talk 22:12, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

I don't know how to do this properly, but you're an admin, so...

User:86.132.121.49 has vandalized Tamil gangs twice. If he should be blocked, could you please do so? Random the Scrambled 00:42, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. Random the Scrambled 14:07, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

Sexuality-related topics

You mentioned to Ros Power that she needs to look at Wikipedia's sexuality-related topics. I agree, she does! So, however, do I. Can you point me in the right direction, please? Thanks! ReformedCharacter 16:23, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

A good place to start would be Wikipedia:Naming conventions (identity). Exploding Boy 02:29, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Talk page

Hey, I think the issue needs to die...so please let it. I shouldn't have made the comment in the first place and there's no point in continuing a discussion that is going to get people heated. Thank you for understanding, Chuck^(contrib) 05:35, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

No, the issue needs to be dealt with. The current situation is untenable. Nathan and I need to discuss this; please, stop getting involved. You're not helping. Exploding Boy 05:36, 15 June 2006 (UTC)