User talk:Ulritz: Difference between revisions
m invalid warning |
warning reverted; section discussed; POV warring inappropriate |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Image:Coat of Arms of Germany.svg|50px|left]][[Image:Flag_of_Preussen_1701-1918.jpg|80px|right]] |
[[Image:Coat of Arms of Germany.svg|50px|left]][[Image:Flag_of_Preussen_1701-1918.jpg|80px|right]] |
||
== 3RR warning on [[Zionist political violence]] == |
|||
{{3RR2|[[Zionist political violence]]}} --<font face="Verdana,San-Serif" size="-2"><strong>[[User:Leflyman|Leflyman]]<sup>[[User talk:Leflyman|Talk]]</sup></strong></font> 19:22, 16 June 2006 (UTC) |
|||
*Do not remove legitimate warnings from your page; it is considered vandalism. See, [[Wikipedia:Vandalism#Types_of_vandalism]]: |
|||
::"''[U]sers generally are permitted to remove and archive comments at their discretion, '''except in cases of warnings, which they are generally prohibited from removing, especially where the intention of the removal is to mislead other editors.'''''"--<font face="Verdana,San-Serif" size="-2"><strong>[[User:Leflyman|Leflyman]]<sup>[[User talk:Leflyman|Talk]]</sup></strong></font> 19:56, 16 June 2006 (UTC) |
|||
*You are incorrect; the section you reverted to non-neutral language has been throughly discussed: |
|||
::*[[Talk:Zionist_political_violence#Terminology_of_.22Zionist_Terrorism.22]] |
|||
::*[[Talk:Zionist_political_violence#Present-day_useage_continued]] |
|||
::*[[Talk:Zionist_political_violence#Neutral_language_in_intoduction]] |
|||
:You have now attempted to nsert your disputed language four times. As is clear from [[Special:Contributions/Ulritz|your contributions]], you appear to be on a [[WP:TROLL#Edit_warring|POV campaign]] against Israel, akin to trolling, as particularly demonstrated by your recent repeated reversions in [[Qana shelling]].—<font face="Verdana,San-Serif" size="-2"><strong>[[User:Leflyman|Leflyman]]<sup>[[User talk:Leflyman|Talk]]</sup></strong></font> 20:47, 16 June 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:47, 16 June 2006
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/da/Coat_of_arms_of_Germany.svg/50px-Coat_of_arms_of_Germany.svg.png)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/9e/Flag_of_Preussen_1892-1918.jpg/80px-Flag_of_Preussen_1892-1918.jpg)
3RR warning on Zionist political violence
![Stop icon](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f1/Stop_hand_nuvola.svg/30px-Stop_hand_nuvola.svg.png)
Your recent editing history at [[:Zionist political violence]] shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --LeflymanTalk 19:22, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
- Do not remove legitimate warnings from your page; it is considered vandalism. See, Wikipedia:Vandalism#Types_of_vandalism:
- "[U]sers generally are permitted to remove and archive comments at their discretion, except in cases of warnings, which they are generally prohibited from removing, especially where the intention of the removal is to mislead other editors."--LeflymanTalk 19:56, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
- You are incorrect; the section you reverted to non-neutral language has been throughly discussed:
- You have now attempted to nsert your disputed language four times. As is clear from your contributions, you appear to be on a POV campaign against Israel, akin to trolling, as particularly demonstrated by your recent repeated reversions in Qana shelling.—LeflymanTalk 20:47, 16 June 2006 (UTC)