Jump to content

Joseph Redman: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Added controversy about role duing battle of midway
Line 7: Line 7:
Every year the Admiral Joseph R. Redman Award is given to the midshipman of the graduating class at the United States Naval Academy who has "demonstrated the greatest achievement in the professional courses in Electrical Fundamentals and Applications" and is nominated by the Electrical Engineering Department.<ref>COMDTMIDN Notice 1650, "Prizes and Awards for 2008," 18 March 2008, www.usna.edu/.../COMDTMIDNNOTE1650_Prizes%20and%20Awards.2008.pdf</ref>
Every year the Admiral Joseph R. Redman Award is given to the midshipman of the graduating class at the United States Naval Academy who has "demonstrated the greatest achievement in the professional courses in Electrical Fundamentals and Applications" and is nominated by the Electrical Engineering Department.<ref>COMDTMIDN Notice 1650, "Prizes and Awards for 2008," 18 March 2008, www.usna.edu/.../COMDTMIDNNOTE1650_Prizes%20and%20Awards.2008.pdf</ref>


After the war Admiral Redman's importance to signals intelligence became a subject of debate, especially pertaining to the gathering of information prior to the [[Battle of Midway]]. Despite his claim that he, and his unit in Washington, had been instrumental in developing the intelligence that led to the succesful battle, it now appeard that in fact Redman and his people had drawn the wrong conclusions. The real work was done by the a cryptoanalist team at Pearl Harbor under the direction of [[Joe Rochefort]]. After the battle Redman claimed the credit and used his influence to destroy Rochefort's career<ref>Toll, Ian. ''Pacific Crucible: War at sea in the Pacific, 1941-1942''. W. W. Norton & Company, Inc., 500 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10110, 2012, p.481-482.</ref>.
After the war the roles of Admiral Redman and his brother [John R. Redman]] during the war became controversial especially pertaining to the gathering of information prior to the [[Battle of Midway]]. Despite their claim that John Redman's unit in Washington, had been instrumental in developing the intelligence that led to the succesful battle, it now appeard that in fact Redman and his people had drawn the wrong conclusions. The real work was done by the a cryptoanalist team at Pearl Harbor under the direction of [[Joe Rochefort]]. After the battle the Redmans claimed the credit and used their influence to destroy Rochefort's career<ref>Toll, Ian. ''Pacific Crucible: War at sea in the Pacific, 1941-1942''. W. W. Norton & Company, Inc., 500 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10110, 2012, p.481-482.</ref>.


== References ==
== References ==

Revision as of 10:31, 12 June 2014

Joseph Reasor Redman (April 17, 1891, to September 7, 1968) was an admiral in the United States Navy. A naval communications officer, he played key roles in signals intelligence during World War II in Washington, D.C.

Biography

Redman graduated from the United States Naval Academy in 1914. He was the brother of John R. Redman, also a prominent naval communications officer. Joseph Redman commanded the USS Tuscaloosa from December 1939 to May 1940.[1] On December 7, 1941, he was serving as the assistant to Rear Admiral Leigh Noyes, the Director of Naval Communications. Following the reorganization of naval communications in February 1942 and the departure of Noyes, Redman succeeded him as DNC until September 1942. Redman then went to the South Pacific to command the USS Phoenix until returning as DNC in an unusual second tour, from April 1943 to August 1945. He retired with the rank of Rear Admiral, and is buried in Arlington National Cemetery.

Every year the Admiral Joseph R. Redman Award is given to the midshipman of the graduating class at the United States Naval Academy who has "demonstrated the greatest achievement in the professional courses in Electrical Fundamentals and Applications" and is nominated by the Electrical Engineering Department.[2]

After the war the roles of Admiral Redman and his brother [John R. Redman]] during the war became controversial especially pertaining to the gathering of information prior to the Battle of Midway. Despite their claim that John Redman's unit in Washington, had been instrumental in developing the intelligence that led to the succesful battle, it now appeard that in fact Redman and his people had drawn the wrong conclusions. The real work was done by the a cryptoanalist team at Pearl Harbor under the direction of Joe Rochefort. After the battle the Redmans claimed the credit and used their influence to destroy Rochefort's career[3].

References

  1. ^ List of commanding officers, USS Tuscaloosa, http://www.navsource.org/archives/04/037/04037.htm
  2. ^ COMDTMIDN Notice 1650, "Prizes and Awards for 2008," 18 March 2008, www.usna.edu/.../COMDTMIDNNOTE1650_Prizes%20and%20Awards.2008.pdf
  3. ^ Toll, Ian. Pacific Crucible: War at sea in the Pacific, 1941-1942. W. W. Norton & Company, Inc., 500 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10110, 2012, p.481-482.

Template:Persondata