Jump to content

Generalized context-free grammar: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
JMP EAX (talk | contribs)
JMP EAX (talk | contribs)
Line 54: Line 54:
On the other hand, LCFRSs are strictly more expressive than [[linear-indexed grammar]]s and their [[equivalence (formal languages)|weakly equivalent]] variant [[tree adjoining grammar]]s (TAGs).<ref name="Kallmeyer2010">{{cite book|author=Laura Kallmeyer|title=Parsing Beyond Context-Free Grammars|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=F5wC0dko1L4C&pg=PA33|year=2010|publisher=Springer Science & Business Media|isbn=978-3-642-14846-0|page=33}}</ref> [[Head grammar]] is another example of an LCFRS that is strictly less powerful than the class of LCFRSs as a whole.
On the other hand, LCFRSs are strictly more expressive than [[linear-indexed grammar]]s and their [[equivalence (formal languages)|weakly equivalent]] variant [[tree adjoining grammar]]s (TAGs).<ref name="Kallmeyer2010">{{cite book|author=Laura Kallmeyer|title=Parsing Beyond Context-Free Grammars|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=F5wC0dko1L4C&pg=PA33|year=2010|publisher=Springer Science & Business Media|isbn=978-3-642-14846-0|page=33}}</ref> [[Head grammar]] is another example of an LCFRS that is strictly less powerful than the class of LCFRSs as a whole.


LCFRS are weakly equivalent to (set-local) ''multicomponent'' TAGs (MCTAGs) and also with [[multiple context-free grammar]] (MCFGs [http://www.labri.fr/perso/salvati/downloads/cours/esslli/course1.pdf]).<ref name="Kallmeyer2010b">{{cite book|author=Laura Kallmeyer|title=Parsing Beyond Context-Free Grammars|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=F5wC0dko1L4C&pg=PA35|year=2010|publisher=Springer Science & Business Media|isbn=978-3-642-14846-0|page=35-36}}</ref>
LCFRS are weakly equivalent to (set-local) ''multicomponent'' TAGs ([MCTAG]]s) and also with [[multiple context-free grammar]] (MCFGs [http://www.labri.fr/perso/salvati/downloads/cours/esslli/course1.pdf]).<ref name="Kallmeyer2010b">{{cite book|author=Laura Kallmeyer|title=Parsing Beyond Context-Free Grammars|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=F5wC0dko1L4C&pg=PA35|year=2010|publisher=Springer Science & Business Media|isbn=978-3-642-14846-0|page=35-36}}</ref> and [[minimalist grammar]]s (MGs). The languages generated by LCFRS (and their weakly equivalents) can be parsed in [[polynomial time]].<ref name="BenthemMeulen2010">{{cite book|author1=Johan F.A.K. van Benthem|author2=Alice ter Meulen|title=Handbook of Logic and Language|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=K7yJLmZCbFUC&pg=PA404|year=2010|publisher=Elsevier|isbn=978-0-444-53727-0|page=404|edition=2nd}}</ref>


== See also ==
== See also ==

Revision as of 19:41, 18 August 2014

Generalized Context-free Grammar (GCFG) is a grammar formalism that expands on context-free grammars by adding potentially non-context free composition functions to rewrite rules.[1] Head grammar (and its weak equivalents) is an instance of such a GCFG which is known to be especially adept at handling a wide variety of non-CF properties of natural language.

Description

A GCFG consists of two components: a set of composition functions that combine string tuples, and a set of rewrite rules. The composition functions all have the form , where is either a single string tuple, or some use of a (potentially different) composition function which reduces to a string tuple. Rewrite rules look like , where , , ... are string tuples or non-terminal symbols.

The rewrite semantics of GCFGs is fairly straight forward. An occurrence of a non-terminal symbol is rewritten using rewrite rules as in a context-free grammar, eventually yielding just compositions (composition functions applied to string tuples or other compositions). The composition functions are then applied, reducing successively reducing the tuples to a single tuple.

Example

A simple translation of a context-free grammar into a GCFG can be performed in the following fashion. Given the grammar in (1), which generates the palindrome language , where is the string reverse of , we can define the composition function conc as in (2a) and the rewrite rules as in (2b).

The CF production of abbbba is

S

aSa

abSba

abbSbba

abbbba

and the corresponding GCFG production is

Linear Context-free Rewriting Systems (LCFRSs)

Weir (1988)[1] describes two properties of composition functions, linearity and regularity. A function defined as is linear if and only if each variable appears at most once on either side of the =, making linear but not . A function defined as is regular if the left hand side and right hand side have exactly the same variables, making regular but not or .

A grammar in which all composition functions are both linear and regular is called a Linear Context-free Rewriting System (LCFRS). LCFRS is a proper subclass of the GCFGs, i.e. it has strictly less computational power than the GCFGs as a whole.

On the other hand, LCFRSs are strictly more expressive than linear-indexed grammars and their weakly equivalent variant tree adjoining grammars (TAGs).[2] Head grammar is another example of an LCFRS that is strictly less powerful than the class of LCFRSs as a whole.

LCFRS are weakly equivalent to (set-local) multicomponent TAGs ([MCTAG]]s) and also with multiple context-free grammar (MCFGs [1]).[3] and minimalist grammars (MGs). The languages generated by LCFRS (and their weakly equivalents) can be parsed in polynomial time.[4]

See also

References

  1. ^ a b Weir, David Jeremy (Sep 1988). Characterizing mildly context-sensitive grammar formalisms (PDF) (Ph.D.). Paper. Vol. AAI8908403. University of Pennsylvania Ann Arbor.
  2. ^ Laura Kallmeyer (2010). Parsing Beyond Context-Free Grammars. Springer Science & Business Media. p. 33. ISBN 978-3-642-14846-0.
  3. ^ Laura Kallmeyer (2010). Parsing Beyond Context-Free Grammars. Springer Science & Business Media. p. 35-36. ISBN 978-3-642-14846-0.
  4. ^ Johan F.A.K. van Benthem; Alice ter Meulen (2010). Handbook of Logic and Language (2nd ed.). Elsevier. p. 404. ISBN 978-0-444-53727-0.