Jump to content

User talk:Kevin Gorman: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
who cares
Undid revision 624547445 by Ihardlythinkso (talk) oops -- wrong admin, sorry (nevertheless, why so self-important!?)
Line 60: Line 60:


Hey all - after a prolonged absence (in large part due to a five week long stay at the [[Mayo Clinic]], heh, I should be back and editing again within the next several days. Best, [[User:Kevin Gorman|Kevin Gorman]] ([[User talk:Kevin Gorman#top|talk]]) 12:43, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
Hey all - after a prolonged absence (in large part due to a five week long stay at the [[Mayo Clinic]], heh, I should be back and editing again within the next several days. Best, [[User:Kevin Gorman|Kevin Gorman]] ([[User talk:Kevin Gorman#top|talk]]) 12:43, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
:You're the admin who unapologetically called me a classic narcissist. Judging by your self-important message here and your profileration of userboxes re personal interests, I wonder how accurate or misdirected?? [[User:Ihardlythinkso|Ihardlythinkso]] ([[User talk:Ihardlythinkso|talk]]) 15:15, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:19, 7 September 2014

A kitten for you!

Hi Kevin,

I'm a very, very new to wikipedia user (I'm still not quite sure how to use it and am frankly not terribly interested in learning -- super luddite here).

I just want to thank you for your commitment to improving the representation of women philosophers on wikipedia. I was appalled to learn that Susanna Siegel didn't have an entry (i'm a phd student in philosophy myself, and my work concerns Siegel's work).

If you are looking for other prominent women philosophers to make entries for, I could certainly give you some suggestions, though I'm guessing you already have plenty in that way.

thanks again, Plnjne

Plnjne (talk) 21:26, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Media Viewer RfC draft principles & findings

Hello. This is a courtesy note that the draft findings and principles in the Media Viewer RfC case have now been posted. The drafters of the proposed decision anticipate a final version of the PD will be posted after 11 August. You are welcome to give feedback on the workshop page. For the Committee, Lord Roem ~ (talk) 02:40, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WP:JSTOR access

Hello, WP:The Wikipedia Library has record of you being approved for access to JSTOR through the TWL partnership described at WP:JSTOR . You should have recieved a Wikipedia email User:The Interior or User:Ocaasi sent several weeks ago with instructions for access, including a link to a form collecting information relevant to that access. Please find that email, and follow those instructions. If you were not approved, did not recieve the email, or are having some other concern or question, please respond to this message at Wikipedia talk:JSTOR/Approved. Thanks much, Sadads (talk) 21:17, 5 August 2014 (UTC) Note: You are recieving this message from an semi-automatically generated list. If you think you were incorrectly contacted, make sure to note that at Wikipedia talk:JSTOR/Approved.[reply]

Media Viewer RfC arbitration case - extension of closure dates

Hello, you are receiving this message because you have commented on the Media Viewer RfC arbitration case. This is a courtesy message to inform you that the closure date for the submission of evidence has been extended to 17 August 2014 and the closure date for workshop proposals has been extended to 22 August 2014, as has the expected date of the proposed decision being posted. The closure dates have been changed to allow for recent developments to be included in the case. If you wish to comment, please review the evidence guidance. For the Arbitration Committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:00, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This Month in Education: August 2014

Media Viewer RfC arbitration case - motion to suspend case

You are receiving this message as you have either commented on a case page or are named as a party to the case. A motion has been proposed to suspend the Media Viewer RfC arbitration case for a maximum of 60 days due to recent developments. If you wish to comment regarding the motion there is a section on the proposed decision talk page for this. For the Arbitration Committee, Callanecc (talkcontribslogs). Message delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 02:33, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm baaaack!

Hey all - after a prolonged absence (in large part due to a five week long stay at the Mayo Clinic, heh, I should be back and editing again within the next several days. Best, Kevin Gorman (talk) 12:43, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]