Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lightbreather

Lightbreather

Lightbreather (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lightbreather/Archive.

01 February 2015

– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.

Suspected sockpuppets

• Lightbreather (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Felsic (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Darknipples (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• 162.119.231.132 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))

• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
• Editor interaction utility

1. http://tools.wmflabs.org/sigma/editorinteract.py?user1=lightbreather&user2=darknipples&user3=Felsic&startdate=&enddate=&ns= 2. http://tools.wmflabs.org/sigma/editorinteract.py?user1=lightbreather&user2=Darknipples&user3=162.119.231.132&startdate=20140101&enddate=20150201&ns= The above 2 interaction analyzers show the interactions between all four socks. What is striking is how a new editor Felsic who admits to recently editing as IP 162.119.231.132 on her talk page was able to bring user Mike Searson to arbitration so quickly as a new editor here:https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&oldid=644029770#Mike_Searson That is pretty impressive for someone claiming to be a new editor and at the same time taking these actions to defend Lightbreather who has often used WP:AR and WP:ANI to go after many editors who oppose her edits. It is also impressive that Felsic is editing the same articles as Lightbreather and Darknipples. Then four days later Lightbreather uses the WP:AR to go after Eric Corbett. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&oldid=644035814#Eric_Corbett Another interesting thing is how Lightbreather came to defend the SPI concerning the IP and Darknipples. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Darknipples Darknipples began editing in June 2014 and surprisingly has almost exclusively edited as SPA concerning 2nd Amendment issues of which the IP/Felsic is doing the same and practically the exact same articles at nearly the same time. Lightbreather brought ScalHotrod to ANI to get him topic banned so she could essentially own the 2nd Amendment issues it boomeranged and she was topic banned for 6 months in July 2014. Then the IP/Felsic shows up in December with extremely sophisticated knowledge of how to bring the experienced editor Mike Searson to arbitration and feigns in her talk page about how unaware she is about all the Wikipedia in and outs. Interestingly Lightbreather and DarkNipples have also used this same behavior of feigning ignorance. Darknipples and Lightbreather also use the "poor ole me I do not know what I am doing" routine and then strike with precision in ANI& ARBCOM against editors who opposes their POV editing style concerning 2nd Amendment issues. Darknipples did not take long (she started editing in June 2014) as a new editor to have her guns a blazing against those who oppose her agenda pushing concerning 2nd Amendment issues. That behavior pattern is the same as Lightbreather and now the IP/Felsic. I do not believe the pattern of aggressive legalistic enforcement knowledge and intimidating warnings and templating of other editors who dare enter the 2nd Amendment articles they are editing is just a coincidence. It seems as if Lightbreather has decided if she cannot get consensus she will create her own by raising up an Army of socks to do her bidding and further her agenda. Lightbreather has already been previously been banned for sock puppetry which she vehemently denied until the evidence overwhelmed her. Lightbreather edit record demonstrates her agenda warrior style (see her topic bans and her lengthy record of dragging editors into ANI and Arbcom) who will do whatever it takes to further her agenda which has included sock puppetry in the past which she was caught for. However it appears her older sock Darknipples escaped the closing ring and then right after the temporary block she began IP editing with a Android 4.4 device using a Chromebook at a Kaiser health facility http://ns.myip.ms/info/whois/162.119.231.132 Now I could be wrong and lightBreather has a very SPA fan club WP:FANCLUB following but I really think that possibility is way out there. The very least is that Felsic and Darknipples are socks. Felsic extremely advanced knowledge of wiki lawyering and self portrayal as newbie do not jive. And that goes for Darknipples as well. Lightbreather may have just come across some very helpful idiots to do some bidding for her but I believe that scenario to be the least likely. I have to say Darknipples and Lightbreather complain, accuse and play the poor ole me I feel so intimidated editing around these aggressive males that I am scared and need some help and protection, card like they are the same which most likely they are. 174.25.212.163 (talk) 16:58, 1 February 2015 (UTC) 174.25.212.163 (talk) 16:58, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

• With respect to the named accounts a checkuser could be a good idea however my concern is that Lighbreather's location is well known and the last Ip sock was located in Tempe/Phoenix, Kaiser Permanente doesn't have facilities in Arizona so the chances that LB ran into California to do these edits are slim but it is possible. I do think the puppetry is possible although not likely, but I always follow the policy once a liar always a liar and that's a consequence of their deception. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 18:23, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

---