User talk:Snake Liquid

It seems to me that you have acted in an uncivil manner on Talk:Solid Snake. It is important to keep a cool head, despite any comments against you. Personal attacks and disruptive comments only escalate a situation; please keep calm and action can be taken against the other parties if necessary. Your involvement in attacking back can only satisfy trolls or anger contributors, and lead to general bad feeling. Please try to remain civil with your comments. Thanks! RandyWang (^raves/_{review me!}) 08:44, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

It seems to me that you are acting in an uncivil manner. Please remain civil and don't resort to making personal attacks or instigate edit wars. RandyWang (^raves/_{review me!}) 08:53, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

Please do not remove messages from your talk page. Talk pages exist as a record of communication, and in any case, comments are available through the page history. You're welcome to archive your talk page, but be sure to provide a link to any deleted comments. Thanks. RandyWang (^raves/_{review me!}) 02:48, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

You want a link? Go into history and there's a link in there. Want it saved? Save it on your page. I'd prefer to not have on my talk page someone telling me what they think of me. Thank you. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Snake Liquid (talk • contribs) .

Again, please refrain from removing legitimate warnings from your user page immediately after they are written. After a reasonable period of time has passed, you are free to archive your talk page. ----Emufarmers^(T/C) 03:33, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

If he's not some sort of moderator, what makes his "Warning" legitimate?--Snake Liquid 05:40, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

I am not involved in whatever dispute you two may be involved in; however, all users are permitted to act as "moderators" when necessary. A warning is not an attack on your character: It is a notice that your behavior may be exceeding the accepted grounds of civil discourse. With regards to the removal of warnings from your talk page, I would suggest reading this and this (the latter is not implemented policy, but it should give you a good idea about why people may find your actions here objectionable). Finally, I thought I should bring to your attention that there is a Wikiquette alert regarding some of your recent actions/comments. I would highly suggest that you step back and try to resolve your dispute in a calm and civil manner, and see others as fellow contributors, rather than antagonists. ----Emufarmers^(T/C) 06:14, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

Thankyou

Thanks for your support on the Snake pic issue, just try to remain (what others would call) civil, otherwise people are going to have you reported. I personally don't think either of us were uncivil, but y'know different people have different opinions of what civil is

Anyway that's all BS, the main thing i wanted to say was cheers for all you help, this issue won't go away quickly

(The Bread 09:43, 28 July 2006 (UTC))

Happycat

When you act like you're in sole control of an article, is when people point the finger and call you an elitist. Probably also why YTMNDers made a target of you. It's a problem with a lot of people here that act "my way or the highway" when it comes to article editing.--Snake Liquid 22:28, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

There have been at least three unrelated users defending British Shorthair against vandalism. Please try to be civil; Targetter has done nothing to indicate a sense of "ownership" over the article. —ptk★fgs 22:42, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

STFU with telling me to be civil, I was being civil. The way I'm acting right now isn't civil, cause I'm fed up with hearing that shit, but that's fine cause it's on my talk page. I don't care who else has been defending it, when at least one of them acts like they own it, I call them on it. A lot of people do it too, and it makes me sick, and THAT's how they indicate a sense of ownership. You know what else annoys the hell out of me? When people come saying things that make them sound like robots. "Please be civil,"? Condescending elitist bullshit. I'm starting to not even believe what you say, because your name is PTKFGS, the bizarro of YTMND, and it's starting to look like your standpoints in opposition of it are just an act for the fun of it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Snake Liquid (talk • contribs) .

Please do not make personal attacks. I've been around YTMND since Picard first went online. I enjoy both YTMND and Wikipedia and I don't want to see either one dragged down by a small minority of folks. I am bothered by the increasingly negative attitude toward YTMND from Wikipedians, and I only hope that YTMND'ers can find a way to encourage each other to respect Wikipedia's guidelines rather than merely taking every opportunity to start edit wars inserting fad references where they don't belong.

Personal attacks can get you blocked from Wikipedia. They don't bother me so much, but others on here will turn uncivil posts over to the admin board without even asking for an explanation. I'm sure YTMND and Wikipedia can learn to get along -- let's make sure they do. —ptk★fgs 23:00, 30 July 2006 (UTC)