User talk:Snake Liquid: Difference between revisions
Snake Liquid (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
::Seriously, I'm not kidding. If an admin picks up on what you're doing, you're likely to get blocked. They will block you for incivility and personal attacks! Save yourself the trouble, move on to a different article, and just stay away from my talk page. That's all I'm asking, dude. --[[User:Targetter|Targetter]] 18:20, 31 July 2006 (UTC) |
::Seriously, I'm not kidding. If an admin picks up on what you're doing, you're likely to get blocked. They will block you for incivility and personal attacks! Save yourself the trouble, move on to a different article, and just stay away from my talk page. That's all I'm asking, dude. --[[User:Targetter|Targetter]] 18:20, 31 July 2006 (UTC) |
||
::He really isn't kidding. People have been blocked for less. Targetter's description of support/oppose debates (as opposed to votes) is [[Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_an_experiment_in_democracy|accurate]], and I think it would be beneficial to listen to what he's said, as opposed to posting hostile comments about it. —[[User:Ptkfgs|<span style="color: #514080; font-family: serif;">ptk</span>]]<span style="font-size: small; color: #514080;">★</span>[[User_talk:Ptkfgs|<span style="color: #514080; font-family: serif;">fgs</span>]] 18:26, 31 July 2006 (UTC) |
::He really isn't kidding. People have been blocked for less. Targetter's description of support/oppose debates (as opposed to votes) is [[Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_an_experiment_in_democracy|accurate]], and I think it would be beneficial to listen to what he's said, as opposed to posting hostile comments about it. —[[User:Ptkfgs|<span style="color: #514080; font-family: serif;">ptk</span>]]<span style="font-size: small; color: #514080;">★</span>[[User_talk:Ptkfgs|<span style="color: #514080; font-family: serif;">fgs</span>]] 18:26, 31 July 2006 (UTC) |
||
::Admins should focus on people who think they ride a high horse instead of the ones that try knocking them off the horse.--[[User:Snake Liquid|Snake Liquid]] 19:11, 31 July 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:11, 31 July 2006
Thankyou
Thanks for your support on the Snake pic issue, just try to remain (what others would call) civil, otherwise people are going to have you reported. I personally don't think either of us were uncivil, but y'know different people have different opinions of what civil is
Anyway that's all BS, the main thing i wanted to say was cheers for all you help, this issue won't go away quickly
(The Bread 09:43, 28 July 2006 (UTC))
Happycat
When you act like you're in sole control of an article, is when people point the finger and call you an elitist. Probably also why YTMNDers made a target of you. It's a problem with a lot of people here that act "my way or the highway" when it comes to article editing.--Snake Liquid 22:28, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
- There have been at least three unrelated users defending British Shorthair against vandalism. Please try to be civil; Targetter has done nothing to indicate a sense of "ownership" over the article. —ptk★fgs 22:42, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
STFU with telling me to be civil, I was being civil. The way I'm acting right now isn't civil, cause I'm fed up with hearing that shit, but that's fine cause it's on my talk page. I don't care who else has been defending it, when at least one of them acts like they own it, I call them on it. A lot of people do it too, and it makes me sick, and THAT's how they indicate a sense of ownership. You know what else annoys the hell out of me? When people come saying things that make them sound like robots. "Please be civil,"? Condescending elitist bullshit. I'm starting to not even believe what you say, because your name is PTKFGS, the bizarro of YTMND, and it's starting to look like your standpoints in opposition of it are just an act for the fun of it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Snake Liquid (talk • contribs) .
- Please do not make personal attacks. I've been around YTMND since Picard first went online. I enjoy both YTMND and Wikipedia and I don't want to see either one dragged down by a small minority of folks. I am bothered by the increasingly negative attitude toward YTMND from Wikipedians, and I only hope that YTMND'ers can find a way to encourage each other to respect Wikipedia's guidelines rather than merely taking every opportunity to start edit wars inserting fad references where they don't belong.
- Personal attacks can get you blocked from Wikipedia. They don't bother me so much, but others on here will turn uncivil posts over to the admin board without even asking for an explanation. I'm sure YTMND and Wikipedia can learn to get along -- let's make sure they do. —ptk★fgs 23:00, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
My Mission Statement
If you're like this guy:
- "This isn't a vote. It's a debate. Even if YTMND gets a bunch of people together to support Happycat, the admins have the final say. --Targetter 02:30, 30 July 2006 (UTC)"
And let's rework that to apply to all. "This isn't a vote. It's a debate. Even if people on one side of the debate gather supporters, it doesn't matter how much support they have because the admins have the final say."
If you're like this guy in any way you act on here, if you bend and twist Wikipedia's rules with semantics so that they help you out, and then contradict or twist them around again to use in authority against other people, hello, I'd like to introduce myself. I'm Snake, and I'm your new problem.
Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Also, personal attacks against another editor on your own talk page won't help your civility situation. --Targetter 17:51, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
- Nice job dropping cookie cutter policy on me there. If you hadn't noticed, I'm not too worried about my civility situation, especially when talking to people that ought to practice what they preach. Besides that, I was using you as an example, I don't see any sort of insult in what I put up there.--Snake Liquid 17:58, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
- Seriously, I'm not kidding. If an admin picks up on what you're doing, you're likely to get blocked. They will block you for incivility and personal attacks! Save yourself the trouble, move on to a different article, and just stay away from my talk page. That's all I'm asking, dude. --Targetter 18:20, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
- He really isn't kidding. People have been blocked for less. Targetter's description of support/oppose debates (as opposed to votes) is accurate, and I think it would be beneficial to listen to what he's said, as opposed to posting hostile comments about it. —ptk★fgs 18:26, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
- Admins should focus on people who think they ride a high horse instead of the ones that try knocking them off the horse.--Snake Liquid 19:11, 31 July 2006 (UTC)