Jump to content

User talk:Lecen: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Both of you...: new section
Line 40: Line 40:


...but the map remains as it is. Suck it.--[[User:Shadowxfox|Shadowxfox]] ([[User talk:Shadowxfox|talk]]) 14:08, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
...but the map remains as it is. Suck it.--[[User:Shadowxfox|Shadowxfox]] ([[User talk:Shadowxfox|talk]]) 14:08, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

== Both of you... ==

...cut [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Shadowxfox&diff=693720415&oldid=693672847 it] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Lecen&diff=693730457&oldid=693686816 out]. [[User:Tide rolls|'''<span style="color:White;background:darkRed">Tide</span>''']][[User talk:Tide rolls|'''<span style="color:darkRed">rolls'''</span>]] 17:12, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:12, 4 December 2015

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FAC: Juan Manuel de Rosas

Hi Lecen. very happy to see you, as it means that you are still involved. I looked you up a month ago, and it appeared that you were hardly involved, so this is a welcome change. Anyway, the reason why I looked you up — and have been meaning to write ever since, but, never getting around to it — is this request that I received, which is custom-made for you - I cannot possibly imagine anyone else to tackle it. Let me know how you feel so I can reply to the editor that approached me. RE: Juan Manuel Rosas, I am loking at it as we speak and I will keep you posted. Best regards, Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia (talk) 16:06, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Map of Empire of Brazil

Here is the map of Brazil in 1822: File:Brazil (1822).svg. The international boundaries according to the sources. --Shadowxfox (talk) 01:22, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but no. We had this same discussion here. This time this map had souces, true sources, almost all of the Brazilian Government (the atlas is from Ministério da Educação, the Treaty of Madrid and San Ildefonso are in commons, the maps of the Empire in 1822 is in commons too). If you want to create a new map with your point of view, do it, but this map remains as it is.--Shadowxfox (talk) 01:36, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I'M SURE. --Shadowxfox (talk) 01:42, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
In any article of the Treaty of Badajoz an exact border is specified, only certain conditions are reversed. As they annulled the treaty of 1777, they returned to the borders of 1750 see the pages 26, 27, 30, 31 of the atlas. That does not mean that borders are current, as you want them to be.
And please, don't be arrogant, I know about history, I know that the historiography of the Portuguese and Spanish colonies are different. If you want to follow this sterile discussion, good for you, but don't expect I modify my map, I prefer to refer to the references.--Shadowxfox (talk) 02:28, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
For real ? Am I immature? Please moderate your words, unless you want to be reported with the bureaucrats.--Shadowxfox (talk) 02:32, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This Wikipedia:Civility is a policy.--Shadowxfox (talk) 02:40, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Shadowxfox (talk) 05:12, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

...but the map remains as it is. Suck it.--Shadowxfox (talk) 14:08, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Both of you...

...cut it out. Tiderolls 17:12, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]