Jump to content

User talk:Zonerocks: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
"Vandal"? WTF?
Line 24: Line 24:
== Hmm ==
== Hmm ==
Why have you been striking through votes in the capture-kidnap-abduct poll? For instance here [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:2006_Israel-Lebanon_conflict&diff=69615015&oldid=69614782]. ~'''[[User:Rangeley|<span style="color:#0055aa;text-decoration:underline;">Rangeley</span>]] ([[User_talk:Rangeley|<span style="color:#0055aa;text-decoration:underline;">talk</span>]])''' 17:03, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
Why have you been striking through votes in the capture-kidnap-abduct poll? For instance here [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:2006_Israel-Lebanon_conflict&diff=69615015&oldid=69614782]. ~'''[[User:Rangeley|<span style="color:#0055aa;text-decoration:underline;">Rangeley</span>]] ([[User_talk:Rangeley|<span style="color:#0055aa;text-decoration:underline;">talk</span>]])''' 17:03, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

== "Vandal"? WTF? ==

Where the hell do you get off accusing me of "vandalism"? First of all, I don't really know to what you're referring, as you included no valid link in your accusation on my discussion page. But I can take a wild-ass guess and surmise that it's [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2006_Israel-Lebanon_conflict&diff=69739529&oldid=69736969 this edit]. If that's the case, then you have no case for "vandalism". I was removing something that clearly didn't belong in the lead of the article. If I was wrong, so be it, but how you make the leap to "vandalism" is beyond me. Care to explain? +[[User:ILike2BeAnonymous|ILike2BeAnonymous]] 07:53, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:53, 15 August 2006

Hello everyone. Im an Editor here on wikipedia. I am currently invovled in updating Israel-Lebanon conflict I am also Working on the Admin Recall that is formatting a new policy on the removal of BAD admin's. I have also created this new Wikipedia Project called WikiPRoject: US Governors . Check it out.

No personal attacks

Please do not make personal attacks on other people. Wikipedia has a policy against personal attacks. In some cases, users who engage in personal attacks may be blocked from editing by admins or banned by the arbitration committee. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Please resolve disputes appropriately. Thank you. LactoseTI 21:11, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Warnings/Notices

Template:Wr0 LactoseTI 21:11, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Cease-fire

Not sure what the users above are talking about, but this article on the cease-fire looks like a couple of news reports stitched together, raising copyright concerns. Gazpacho 02:54, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Ditto 2006 UN Resoultion Cease Fire Between Israel and Lebanon. Please use a spell checker. -- RHaworth 07:44, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandal?

Hello, Zone.

Firstly, it would behoove you to check the edit histories before you make unfounded accusations. I did not necessarily add the quote, but I did confirm that is what the citation brings, and updated the template. Secondly, as I mentioned on the talk page, my personal beliefs notwithstanding (and a quick poll of about twenty other sysops and editors will make painfully clear where my beliefs lie) at WIklipedia, we have to use verifiable and reliable sources to show both sides as accurately as possible. You would not want an article filled solely with Al-jazeera statements would you? War is ugly, and many of my relatives had to flee the North and are bunking out in Yerushalayim etc. But Tzedek, Tzedek tirdof, and trying to approach this with an even keel is the best way, IMO, to ensure that the articles remain on an even keel. Now, is there some gripe in particular you have with me? I'd be happy to discuss it with you. -- Avi 21:22, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, I live in the US, but most of my mother's family lives in Eretz Yisrael, literally MiDan ad Be'er Sheva. Are you in EY? -- Avi 02:49, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm

Why have you been striking through votes in the capture-kidnap-abduct poll? For instance here [1]. ~Rangeley (talk) 17:03, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Vandal"? WTF?

Where the hell do you get off accusing me of "vandalism"? First of all, I don't really know to what you're referring, as you included no valid link in your accusation on my discussion page. But I can take a wild-ass guess and surmise that it's this edit. If that's the case, then you have no case for "vandalism". I was removing something that clearly didn't belong in the lead of the article. If I was wrong, so be it, but how you make the leap to "vandalism" is beyond me. Care to explain? +ILike2BeAnonymous 07:53, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]