Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Ali Farka Toure: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Adam Cuerden (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
* '''Support''' – Nice portrait. Size isn't huge but at normal res facial detail is OK. Guy has a way with the [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1VLKipIicfc&list=RD1VLKipIicfc#t=26 axe,] all right. [[User:Sca|Sca]] ([[User talk:Sca|talk]]) 16:10, 20 January 2016 (UTC) |
* '''Support''' – Nice portrait. Size isn't huge but at normal res facial detail is OK. Guy has a way with the [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1VLKipIicfc&list=RD1VLKipIicfc#t=26 axe,] all right. [[User:Sca|Sca]] ([[User talk:Sca|talk]]) 16:10, 20 January 2016 (UTC) |
||
* '''Oppose''' - A modern black and white photo is always going to be questionable regarding EV, however that can indeed be forgiven on a case by case basis. In this case though it's not very sharp, as mentioned it's fairly grainy and it appears to just be a grayscale version of this colour picture [https://fanart.tv/fanart/music/9be2a5ac-8201-489b-b5f6-91f958bf9060/artistthumb/tour-ali-farka-51508fc34f1a8.jpg]. For a modern photo not FP material for me. - [[User:Wolftick|Wolftick]] ([[User talk:Wolftick|talk]]) 17:09, 20 January 2016 (UTC) |
* '''Oppose''' - A modern black and white photo is always going to be questionable regarding EV, however that can indeed be forgiven on a case by case basis. In this case though it's not very sharp, as mentioned it's fairly grainy and it appears to just be a grayscale version of this colour picture [https://fanart.tv/fanart/music/9be2a5ac-8201-489b-b5f6-91f958bf9060/artistthumb/tour-ali-farka-51508fc34f1a8.jpg]. For a modern photo not FP material for me. - [[User:Wolftick|Wolftick]] ([[User talk:Wolftick|talk]]) 17:09, 20 January 2016 (UTC) |
||
**'''Withdraw''' per Wolftick. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.118em 0.118em 0.118em; class=texhtml">'''[[User:Adam Cuerden|Adam Cuerden]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Adam Cuerden|talk]])</sup></span> 17:46, 20 January 2016 (UTC) |
|||
<!-- additional votes go above this line --> |
<!-- additional votes go above this line --> |
||
{{-}} |
{{-}} |
Revision as of 17:46, 20 January 2016
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 30 Jan 2016 at 12:57:47 (UTC)
- Reason
- Not technically perfect, but also not bad. For a deceased musician, the minor issues - some graininess, unnecessary black-and-white - can easily be forgiven.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Ali Farka Touré
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Entertainment
- Creator
- Tagles
- Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden (talk) 12:57, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
- Support – Nice portrait. Size isn't huge but at normal res facial detail is OK. Guy has a way with the axe, all right. Sca (talk) 16:10, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose - A modern black and white photo is always going to be questionable regarding EV, however that can indeed be forgiven on a case by case basis. In this case though it's not very sharp, as mentioned it's fairly grainy and it appears to just be a grayscale version of this colour picture [1]. For a modern photo not FP material for me. - Wolftick (talk) 17:09, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
- Withdraw per Wolftick. Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:46, 20 January 2016 (UTC)