User talk:117.213.18.84: Difference between revisions
←Created page with 'The citation reference here: is inaccurate. please correct this or get a new citation. Climate forecaster, Sales specialist, Accelerator Systems Operator, Tech...' |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
It links to http://www.aps.org/careers/physicists/bsphysgov.cfm which is a totally reputable source (American Physical Society)! Why are you changing these definitions mentioned in the citation? |
It links to http://www.aps.org/careers/physicists/bsphysgov.cfm which is a totally reputable source (American Physical Society)! Why are you changing these definitions mentioned in the citation? |
||
== November 2016 == |
|||
[[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=Stop icon]] Your recent editing history at [[:Physicist]] shows that you are currently engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to work toward making a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See [[Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle|BRD]] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. |
|||
'''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''—especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> [[User:Clpo13|clpo13]]<sub>([[User_talk:Clpo13|talk]])</sub> 23:55, 10 November 2016 (UTC) |
|||
:''If this is a [[Network address translation|shared IP address]], and you did not make the edits, consider [[Wikipedia:Why create an account?|creating an account]] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> |
|||
Revision as of 23:55, 10 November 2016
The citation reference here: is inaccurate. please correct this or get a new citation. Climate forecaster, Sales specialist, Accelerator Systems Operator, Technologist, Engineering Physicist, Programmer, Laboratory Technician, X-ray physicist,...etc.[15]
It links to http://www.aps.org/careers/physicists/bsphysgov.cfm which is a totally reputable source (American Physical Society)! Why are you changing these definitions mentioned in the citation?
November 2016
Your recent editing history at Physicist shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. clpo13(talk) 23:55, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.