User talk:KyndFellow: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 01:43, 3 November 2006

As an editor involved in this dispute, you are invited to enter a statement in the RfC under Talk:Sex_tourism. — edgarde 22:16, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 As an editor involved in this dispute, you are invited to enter a statement in the [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Society%2C_law%2C_and_sex|RfC]] under [[Talk:Sex_tourism#Request_for_Comment|Talk:Sex_tourism]]. &mdash; [[User:Edgarde|edgarde]] 22:16, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
-== [[Talk:Sex_tourism#Definition_of_sex_tourism|Definition of sex tourism]] ==
-Edgarde, This is Daniel who you've been corrisponding with regarding the Sex tourism page.  In case you haven't noticed by now, I'm new at Wikipedia. :-)  I just read through the guidelines and the processes of despute resolution.  Thank you for making that RfC link for us, and introducing it on the talk page of Sex tourism.
-I made a change to the end of the Sex tourism definition, and I wanted to know if this is acceptable to you?<br>
-Daniel E. Knodel, M.A. 06:00, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
-: This is not acceptable. For the same reasons stated repeatedly by me and by [[Talk:Sex_tourism#Request_for_Comment|User:RandomP]], the points of which you have managed to repeatedly miss. I find it very hard to believe you are being sincere.
-: Please revert your definition to the former one[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=84500167&oldid=84479276]. Please remove your spam link to Sly Sex Guide. It has been explained to you with clarity what you are doing wrong; your latest set of changes does not address any of these problems. &mdash; [[User:Edgarde|edgarde]] 06:54, 2 November 2006 (UTC)