Jump to content

User talk:Elisa.rolle: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 13: Line 13:
:::::::Today you edit warred with multiple users, kept making changes that you knew other editors disagreed with, and when one of them reached out to you, gave every indication that you had no intent on listening to the concerns of others about your behavior. For an editor who has previously been indefinitely blocked three times, and who simply blanks any attempt to interact with them on their talk page that they do not like, there really isn't much else to do other than an indef block. This would have been blockable on its own, but your history on this project is what led to it being indefinite. This does not have to be since May, as you seem to be claiming, but takes into account your behavior as a whole. [[User:TonyBallioni|TonyBallioni]] ([[User talk:TonyBallioni|talk]]) 17:46, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
:::::::Today you edit warred with multiple users, kept making changes that you knew other editors disagreed with, and when one of them reached out to you, gave every indication that you had no intent on listening to the concerns of others about your behavior. For an editor who has previously been indefinitely blocked three times, and who simply blanks any attempt to interact with them on their talk page that they do not like, there really isn't much else to do other than an indef block. This would have been blockable on its own, but your history on this project is what led to it being indefinite. This does not have to be since May, as you seem to be claiming, but takes into account your behavior as a whole. [[User:TonyBallioni|TonyBallioni]] ([[User talk:TonyBallioni|talk]]) 17:46, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
::::::::[[User:TonyBallioni|TonyBallioni]], then again you "continuous disruptive editing" in the last months is just about today; and again, the fact that the other user is asking you to unblock me should give you the hint that probably it was not only on my side. Sorry, you misjudged today events and you took a decision without asking before to me or even the other side if the block was necessary. And your justification is I was blocked three times. The fact for the last months I was behaving according to what you asked me is not worth anything, according to your explanation. [[User:Elisa.rolle|Elisa.rolle]] ([[User talk:Elisa.rolle#top|talk]]) 17:57, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
::::::::[[User:TonyBallioni|TonyBallioni]], then again you "continuous disruptive editing" in the last months is just about today; and again, the fact that the other user is asking you to unblock me should give you the hint that probably it was not only on my side. Sorry, you misjudged today events and you took a decision without asking before to me or even the other side if the block was necessary. And your justification is I was blocked three times. The fact for the last months I was behaving according to what you asked me is not worth anything, according to your explanation. [[User:Elisa.rolle|Elisa.rolle]] ([[User talk:Elisa.rolle#top|talk]]) 17:57, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
::::::::[[User:TonyBallioni|TonyBallioni]], and the multiple users are just two working together with the same purpose. [[User:Elisa.rolle|Elisa.rolle]] ([[User talk:Elisa.rolle#top|talk]]) 18:00, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:00, 11 August 2018

Retired
This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

TonyBallioni has decided to block me because I was trying to preserve an article Wee Curry Monster is disrupting. Instead of asking for explanation TonyBallioni has decided to block me. This is the definitive prove that that Wikipedia is not a place where people can collaborate. Elisa.rolle (talk) 17:10, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An article I am trying to improve, an article which originally contained direct quotes from works of fiction rather than reliable sources, and an article in which you insisted an WP:SPS was "good enough". I have tried to co-operate, including directing you to where sources can be found. That much is easily verified from the article talk page. WCMemail 17:16, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
"direct quotes from works of fiction" was not done by me; but if your removing all info about Author, Title and Year of two books, and writing, "there are two historical novels about this woman" is improving the article, then I have a different concept of "improving". Now the details are at least in the references, I do not like it, but if I was not to intervene, neither that info would be available. I'm not sure it is worth my block, but I suppose someone was just waiting for a chance. You gave that chance. As I said, I'm tired to be judged, therefore, goodbye also to you. Elisa.rolle (talk) 17:22, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I was actually in the process of formatting two references from google books, in case you haven't noticed I've asked the blocking admin to reconsider. You need to stop lashing out at people. WCMemail 17:25, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Should anyone wish to see my explanation for why this block is needed, it can be found here. I'm not going to repeat myself since Elisa apparently wants to have her talk page confined to a discussion of my actions. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:27, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
And as I said, I had already decided to let you do what you wanted with the article, but TonyBallioni has decided to block me, and yes, he did it cause you decided to "warn" me on my page. If now you are sorry and you are asking to TonyBallioni to undo it, as he has replied, it's too late. Goodbye to you and TonyBallioni as well. I'm tired of this all. TonyBallioni in three months I haven't had any issue at all, I was just improving article, not writing anything new. Please let me know where in the last three months there were issue from me? your accuse is wrong and I resent it. Elisa.rolle (talk) 17:29, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I'd suggest you review your block log and everything that you have blanked from this talk page. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:30, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
TonyBallioni, again, please, list me what I did in the last three months that is worth of a block. Elisa.rolle (talk) 17:32, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
TonyBallioni, after the Dorothy Caruso's event (in May) and after you asked me to remove the reason why I retired from Wikipedia, which I did, and for that you thanked me, what did I do? other than today, and again, it was not just me that was edit warring and the other user even say so, for which reason you are blocking me? where is the continue disruptive editing you are using as reason for the blocking? Elisa.rolle (talk) 17:37, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Today you edit warred with multiple users, kept making changes that you knew other editors disagreed with, and when one of them reached out to you, gave every indication that you had no intent on listening to the concerns of others about your behavior. For an editor who has previously been indefinitely blocked three times, and who simply blanks any attempt to interact with them on their talk page that they do not like, there really isn't much else to do other than an indef block. This would have been blockable on its own, but your history on this project is what led to it being indefinite. This does not have to be since May, as you seem to be claiming, but takes into account your behavior as a whole. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:46, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
TonyBallioni, then again you "continuous disruptive editing" in the last months is just about today; and again, the fact that the other user is asking you to unblock me should give you the hint that probably it was not only on my side. Sorry, you misjudged today events and you took a decision without asking before to me or even the other side if the block was necessary. And your justification is I was blocked three times. The fact for the last months I was behaving according to what you asked me is not worth anything, according to your explanation. Elisa.rolle (talk) 17:57, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
TonyBallioni, and the multiple users are just two working together with the same purpose. Elisa.rolle (talk) 18:00, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]