Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Kristina Inhof

Kristina Inhof

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Jul 2019 at 15:41:55 (UTC)

Original – Kristina Inhof, Austrian presenter and sports journalist at ORF. FIFA Women's Football World Cup Qualification 2019, Austria vs. Serbia.

Reason

Good portrait, high detail, good quality and good EV

Articles in which this image appears

Kristina Inhof

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Entertainment

Creator

Granada

• Support as nominator – Tomer T (talk) 15:41, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
• Support. Great! Josh Milburn (talk) 18:31, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
• Support. --Janke | Talk 18:35, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
• Support Geoffroi 21:41, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
• Support. Good quality, attractive picture, ok EV, and the fact that she's just standing there looking cheerful is appropriate for someone who's notable as a presenter and sports journalist. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:28, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
• Support : Amazing portrait DreamSparrow ^Chat 07:35, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
• Comment Oppose – Definitely a toothy grin in this apparently promotional shot of a minor media celebrity. Fantastic EV – for Zahnärzte. – Sca (talk) 12:46, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

  Heh, yea, toothy ;-E - but why do you call it promotional? I do concur that the article EV isn't so great, but it's a nice potrait, for a change... --Janke | Talk 16:55, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

Nice portraits are a dime a dozen in PR-land. What's interesting is a face showing experience, character, etc. – Sca (talk) 21:36, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

This nice portrait is free, and she looks beautiful and confident. Geoffroi 04:01, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

• Oppose. No encyclopedic value. Espresso Addict (talk) 04:30, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Not for the vast majority of Eng.-lang. readers. One must ask why this slick pic. of an Austrian sports journalist would be of interest to English-language Wiki's Main Page audience. Wieso ist sie für dieses Publikium interessant? – Sca (talk) 13:06, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

Well, considering the subject of today's featured article (1927_Chicago_mayoral_election), I actually prefer this... ;-) --Janke | Talk 19:34, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

We don't go by "vast majority of readers" and "interest of main page audience", we go by notability. Main page is the front face of an encyclopedia, not a journal. FP criteria defines EV in term of article usage, not main page use or suitability. Bammesk (talk) 15:16, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

Some of us prefer to think for ourselves, drawing on training and experience, rather than consult an institutional rule book assembled by anonymous persons of unknown qualifications. – Sca (talk) 21:41, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

• Support --Yann (talk) 09:15, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
• Support - Cwilson97 (talk) 15:57, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
• Support – A good sports photographer is freely uploading their work to Wikimedia projects. Why are people whingeing here? The complaints department is over there. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 17:51, 5 July 2019 (UTC)