User talk:Weatherextremes

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Weatherextremes. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

About the non-official data in the climate of Athens page.

You are still using and prevailing the non-official data from that blog called "meteo-club" over official data of HNMS in the page of Athens (climate paragraph) as I can see. Your data from the "meteo-club" is not being even removed, it's just left as the 3rd source because the other ones are from the official HNMS stations. Even if you say "it's the oldest station" "it's official by the WMO" there is no reliable source proving that except from that "club" website, which is not any kind of official website and I can't find how reliable it is. Also, climates are held by 30 year periods, not 17, like the HNMS offers, as per WMO standards (1961-1990, 1971-2000, 1981-2010) in this case the Elleniko and Nea Filadelfia stations use the 1981-2010 data while your station uses 2001-2018 data (that's not any official period, 17 years of data) and neither is the source from any official or government source. But still, please don't put it as the first climate box, i'm not even removing your data even if it's reliablity is questionable, i'm leaving it there but please don't prevail it over official HNMS data again or I will have to warn the wikipedia moderators about this. In your talk page history you've been warned before for edit warring and breaking the 3RR rules but you deleted them without replying. Even if you remove the data without reverting it's still considered for both Wikipedia rule breaking, and if you keep adding this non-official data over the HNMS one I will warn a moderator.

Please check Wikipedia:Verifiability and you will see that normally, your weatherbox from that "meteo-club" website wouldn't even have to be there since there are 2 official stations from the HNMS, but i'm still leaving it, although it can't prevail since it's not official data nor it comes from an official source. I hope you will understand. Thanks. --TechnicianGB (talk) 09:46, 17 September 2019 (UTC)