Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Priyansh Jadhav: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
(using spihelper.js) |
Comment (using spihelper.js) |
||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
* If they're CU confirmed on commons, and some are blocked on >1 wiki, then global locks are the next step rather than replicating the work on enwiki. {{GlobalLocksRequested}} [[User:Cabayi|Cabayi]] ([[User talk:Cabayi|talk]]) 14:47, 11 September 2020 (UTC) |
|||
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
Revision as of 14:47, 11 September 2020
Priyansh Jadhav
- Priyansh Jadhav (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Populated account categories: confirmed
For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Priyansh Jadhav/Archive.
10 September 2020
Suspected sockpuppets
- PriyanshJadhav 1306 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Priyanshjadhav3110 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
All are confirmed on Commons - CU data are here. Socks engage in self promotion, including Priyanshjadhav3110 twice recreating the deleted Draft:Priyansh Jadhav, which had initially been created by PriyanshJadhav 1306. I cannot see deleted revisions, but current version appears to be a hoax (sources provided, when functioning, discuss unrelated legitimate performers and contain no mention of Jadhav whatsoever.) Эlcobbola talk 21:30, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- If they're CU confirmed on commons, and some are blocked on >1 wiki, then global locks are the next step rather than replicating the work on enwiki.
Global lock(s) requested Cabayi (talk) 14:47, 11 September 2020 (UTC)