Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Chronicles of Spellborn: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
!vote summary made clearer
Gwernol (talk | contribs)
This is not appropriate. The issue is decided on the consensus of the group, not by simply counting votes. Please don't disrupt the process
Line 17: Line 17:
*'''Keep''' per Brad's reasoning. It seems pointless to remove an article just to rewrite a substantially similar version. Not to mention that doing so will probably just result in a AfD nomination [[User:Alan Shatte|Alan Shatte]] 21:35, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' per Brad's reasoning. It seems pointless to remove an article just to rewrite a substantially similar version. Not to mention that doing so will probably just result in a AfD nomination [[User:Alan Shatte|Alan Shatte]] 21:35, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' Encyclopedic article, about notable software. [[User:Joel Jimenez|Joel Jimenez]] 04:25, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' Encyclopedic article, about notable software. [[User:Joel Jimenez|Joel Jimenez]] 04:25, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
*The preceeding comments, which are not votes, '''began with one of the following words'''
** Delete: 5
** Keep: 6 [[User:Joel Jimenez|Joel Jimenez]] 04:55, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:05, 6 January 2007

The Chronicles of Spellborn

The Chronicles of Spellborn (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Advert for a non-notable unreleased game. CiaranG 17:01, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speedy delete - as per nom. Reads like an advert. Ronbo76 17:43, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete at least until it's released or near to being. At the moment the publisher is listed as "unknown". Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 17:54, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. Koweja 19:38, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy Delete per WP:CSD, specifically G11 (blatant advertising). The article was created by a user named Freeze tcos (TCOS = The Chronicles of Spellborn) with exactly five contributions within an hour and a half: Two updates to the article itself, uploading an image for the logo, and adding information about the game to List of MMORPGs and Massively multiplayer online first-person shooter. Lankybugger 20:12, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete until the game is released or a publisher is announced. Alan Shatte 21:53, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep I am not convinced that it is an advertisement. The game has many articles at IGN PC, the latest being dated in October. [1] Gamerankings lists 6 previews [2] from notable websites like GameSpot, 1UP, and IGN. Jessica Anne Stevens 22:28, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak delete. I would change to Keep if rewritten by a neutral editor. (I might do it if I have extra free time, but don't hold your breath.) Although game is probably notable enough, the current version of the article has WP:COI issues. --Alan Au 05:13, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • As I wrote in your talk page, if you need help with this let me know. Jessica Anne Stevens 06:04, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep the article doesn't claim anything extraordinary that would make the COI issues larger than its notability. Paul D. Meehan 05:47, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Paul and others. Gisele Hsieh 20:23, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Everything besides the author seems okay. Other Wikipedians have shown interest in helping with the article, so it has some merit besides being a vanity/promotional piece. Brad Guzman 20:32, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Brad's reasoning. It seems pointless to remove an article just to rewrite a substantially similar version. Not to mention that doing so will probably just result in a AfD nomination Alan Shatte 21:35, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Encyclopedic article, about notable software. Joel Jimenez 04:25, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]