Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Kermanshahi: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 38: Line 38:
'''Support'''
'''Support'''


#<s> I support Kermanshahi, [[User:Ayatollah Rhobijnie|Rhobinji, loyal servant of the Great and Mostly Honarable Kermanshahi!]] 19:24, 20 March 2007 (UTC)</s>
# I support Kermanshahi, [[User:Ayatollah Rhobijnie|Rhobinji, loyal servant of the Great and Mostly Honarable Kermanshahi!]] 19:24, 20 March 2007 (UTC)</s>
#<s> I support Kermanshahi, he shure is a good user, [[User:Mrlob|the Honorable Mrlob]] 19:25, 20 March 2007 (UTC)</s>
#<s> I support Kermanshahi, he sure is a good user, [[User:Mrlob|the Honorable Mrlob]] 19:25, 20 March 2007 (UTC)</s>

#<s> I think Kermanshahi is very capable of being a administrator, [[User:Kashwialariski|the Old and respectable Kashwialariski]] 19:48, 20 March 2007 (UTC)</s>
::<small>Striking votes as obvious sockpuppets. [[User:Michaelas10|Michaelas10]]<sup>[[User talk:Michaelas10|<font color="darkgreen">Respect my authoritah]]</font></sup> 13:23, 22 March 2007 (UTC)</small>
::<small>Striking vote as being an obvious sockpuppet. [[User:Michaelas10|Michaelas10]]<sup>[[User talk:Michaelas10|<font color="darkgreen">Respect my authoritah]]</font></sup> 13:23, 22 March 2007 (UTC)</small>


'''Oppose'''
'''Oppose'''
Line 49: Line 49:


'''Neutral'''
'''Neutral'''
# I don't know, I really don't. He needs to get more expierence, I suppose he should cme back later (wait some months, maybe...)
#

[[User:Kashwialariski|the Old and respectable Kashwialariski]] 13:30, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:30, 22 March 2007

Voice your opinion (0/3/0); Scheduled to end 13:12, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Kermanshahi (talk · contribs) - Kermanshahi is a very active, friendly and nice to work with user. He is allways very helpfull for those who just began as new users. He is very much dedicated to his homeland Iran; he knows loads of information about it, but he also knows much about other countries, their history, military and culture. He is very friendly, polite, knows the answer for many questions and, last but not least; he is allways ready to help. That is why I personally think, he should be an administrator. Rhobinji, loyal servant of the Great and Mostly Honarable Kermanshahi! 18:56, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hereby I accept the nomination: Kermanshahi 21:36, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. What sysop chores do you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Administrative backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.

I am ready to help with anything. Kermanshahi 21:29, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any with which you are particularly pleased, and why?

I am particulary pleased with the list of countries by number of total troops wich I consider as my masterpiece , I added from all countries from rank 11 until rank 107 and I already have plans to add more I also even made a map for it wich can be viewed on This page. I have also recieved an impressive amounth of :7. barnstars and the Distinguished service award that is the highest award of the Military History project ! Kermanshahi 21:29, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

I have had a confilict with macutty, he wanted to make Iran's total troops 1,000,000 instead of 11,000,000. We had a long discussion and eventually he didn't reply and left the article as it was Kermanshahi 21:29, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

General comments

Please keep criticism constructive and polite.

Discussion

Support

  1. I support Kermanshahi, Rhobinji, loyal servant of the Great and Mostly Honarable Kermanshahi! 19:24, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. I support Kermanshahi, he sure is a good user, the Honorable Mrlob 19:25, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Striking vote as being an obvious sockpuppet. Michaelas10Respect my authoritah 13:23, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose

  1. Oppose - Only 236 edits. Make some more edits, get some experience and come back in several months. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 13:14, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose Bad answers to questions, low edit count, but those three supports in rapid-fire succession way before the RfA came here is odd. Plus, well...nah, I won't pile on. You got a fair use image on your userpage though, that's a violation.--Wizardman 13:18, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Edit conflict Oppose Weak answers to questions with regard to expressing why the administrative tools are needed, and a lack of experience related to administrative duties. Leebo T/C 13:19, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

  1. I don't know, I really don't. He needs to get more expierence, I suppose he should cme back later (wait some months, maybe...)

the Old and respectable Kashwialariski 13:30, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]