Jump to content

User talk:IPSOS: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Eep² (talk | contribs)
vandalism warning
IPSOS (talk | contribs)
ciao!!
Line 33: Line 33:


The fact that it's only visible as a comment does not make it civil. [[User:Taemyr|Taemyr]] 02:09, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
The fact that it's only visible as a comment does not make it civil. [[User:Taemyr|Taemyr]] 02:09, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

== vandalism warning ==

{{{icon|[[Image:Information.svg|25px]] }}}Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. At least one of your recent edits{{{{{subst|}}}#if:Closed|, such as the one you made to [[:Closed]],}} was not constructive and has been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]] or removed. Please use [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|the sandbox]] for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the [[Wikipedia:Introduction|welcome page]] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 --> See [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Closed&diff=137808693&oldid=137808601 this edit]. You're on the right track but try to be a tad bit less condescending about it, eh? ∞[[User:Eep²|'''Σɛ<sub>Þ</sub>²''']] <sup>([[User_talk:Eep²|τ]]|[[Special:Contributions/Eep²|c]])</sup> 02:18, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:22, 13 June 2007

Archives

Add new messages at end please

Your userpage has been vandalized (a few times actually)

Just wanted to warn you. Have a good day, MrMacMan Talk 22:31, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Suspected sock puppet case

Hello. I've closed Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Emnx (2nd). The User:SKRINE2 account seems a fairly obvious, disruptive sock of the blocked User:Emnx, so I've indefinitely blocked the sockpuppet account and extended Emnx's block. I don't see convincing circumstantial evidence regarding User:Coldmachine, as they've been around a while and contributed in a couple of different areas. If you're highly suspicious, checkuser would probably be necessary for that account. Please let me know of any questions. MastCell Talk 18:15, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alchemy FAR Review

Alchemy has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here.

Thanks

Thanks for your catch on the Guru Gita page, I have to agree, that link belongs. BTW, I just wanted to say that I've appreciated your edits and comments on the articles which we have interacted on. Keep up the good work.TheRingess (talk) 15:50, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Need your opinion

Do you think this line is appropriate for the Gurudev Siddha Peeth article.

"People who wish to stay there are asked to apply first (see external link below)."

TheRingess (talk) 13:44, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Divine Nous

I don't appreciate the implication that I didn't search properly. Of course I was aware of the Nous article. The original submitted Divine Nous article made a clear distinction between "Divine Nous" and "Nous": "Pythagoreanism goes on to point out that the Divine Nous is the intuitive direct grasp of ideas and is different for your own personal human nous." You're welcome to propose a merger, of course, but the article I created was obviously intended to be a separate article and not clearly a duplicate of Nous. Powers T 13:32, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And you think that was obvious from the text of the proposed article? Powers T 13:35, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I know it can be frustrating. I normally wouldn't have wandered into the topic area at all, but for the article creation request. In that realm, I find it best to just weed out the obviously bad articles and let the borderline ones be vetted by the community, particularly by those most familiar with the subject matter. =) Have a nice day. Powers T 01:45, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep a civil tone.

The fact that it's only visible as a comment does not make it civil. Taemyr 02:09, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]