User talk:Beit Or: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 00:11, 3 July 2007

This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot. Any sections older than 14 days are automatically archived to User talk:Beit Or/Archive 3. Sections without timestamps are not archived.

Islamophobia

A request for mediation has been filed with the Mediation Committee that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Islamophobia, and indicate whether you agree or refuse to mediate. If you are unfamiliar with mediation, please refer to Wikipedia:Mediation. There are only seven days for everyone to agree, so please check as soon as possible. ITAQALLAH 20:36, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Mediation

A Request for Mediation to which you are a party has been accepted. You can find more information on the mediation subpage, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Islamophobia.

For the Mediation Committee, ^demon^{[omg plz]}

This message delivered by MediationBot, an automated bot account operated by the Mediation Committee to open new mediation cases. If you have questions about this bot, please contact the Mediation Committee directly.

This message delivered: 12:16, 21 June 2007 (UTC).

Content forking

Please see Wikipedia:Content forking#Article spinouts - "Summary style" articles. Content forking isn't automatically bad - it's a perfectly legitimate way of dealing in more depth with a topic that's too substantial to be covered in an overview article. -- ChrisO 09:22, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The fork in question mostly copies the original article. It's as bad as you can get. Beit Or 09:27, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're overlooking the circumstances in which I rewrote the original article. House demolition was originally almost entirely focused on the I-P conflict, which I felt was inappropriate due to the topic having a much broader scope, which is why I rewrote it in the first place. However, the I-P angle is sufficiently distinct and complex to justify a spin-off article on the issues which arise with this particular use of house demolition. It's certainly well documented by reliable sources; Google Books returns 153 separate works which cover the issue. If you don't like the current article, the way to deal with that is to improve it, not by blanking it. That constitutes vandalism - please don't do it again. -- ChrisO 10:23, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review request for Battle of Uhud

There's a new peer review request for Battle of Uhud that may be of interest to you; any input there would be appreciated. Thanks! Wandalstouring 08:57, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Part of your job as a contact. Wandalstouring 09:56, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done that[1]. Sorry it took so long to respond; I had no time to edit in the last couple of days. Beit Or 19:37, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, I was a bit tense because it was the first real test of the contact system. I will ask Kirill for more help on coding the userbox. Wandalstouring 18:16, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

re:

i'm not sure what your concerns are about my copyedit. what is wrong with this edit? superiority over something automatically connotes inferiority of the latter. likewise, what is wrong with this one? the "humiliating regulations" are the "legal and social restrictions". no need for repetition. my observation from Lewis was tangental, unrelated to the central rationale for the edits. ITAQALLAH 23:01, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

stalking and unwarranted reverts by beit

17:07, July 1, 2007 (hist) (diff) User talk:Rktect (→Warning) 17:06, July 1, 2007 (hist) (diff) User talk:Rktect (Warning) 16:32, July 1, 2007 (hist) (diff) Isaac Newton's occult studies (rv original research) (top) 16:31, July 1, 2007 (hist) (diff) Deborah (stop inserting your original research) 15:58, July 1, 2007 (hist) (diff) Habiru (Undid revision 141838629 by Rktect (talk)) (top) 15:56, July 1, 2007 (hist) (diff) Deborah (remove original research) 15:56, July 1, 2007 (hist) (diff) Baal-zephon (Undid revision 141857893 by Rktect (talk)) (top) 15:55, July 1, 2007 (hist) (diff) Sarah (Undid revision 141857680 by Rktect (talk))

Eight reverts without discussion on talk page of user rktect today Typically claiming original research for pages which are nothing but references and citesRktect 00:11, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]