User talk:Beit Or: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 00:19, 13 September 2007

This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot. Any sections older than 14 days are automatically archived to User talk:Beit Or/Archive 3. Sections without timestamps are not archived.

Hi beit

Since you're a regular on middle east topics, can you please review this proposal[1]. AhvaziKaka —The preceding unsigned comment was added by AhvaziKaka (talk • contribs) 00:24, August 23, 2007 (UTC).

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XVIII (August 2007)

The August 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 09:04, 5 September 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Peer review request for Islamic military jurisprudence

There's a new peer review request for Islamic military jurisprudence that may be of interest to you; any input there would be appreciated. Thanks! Wandalstouring 11:30, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Religion of Peace

I am working on a rewrite of the Religion of Peace at User:Mike Young/Sandbox2 would value your comments on this, and especially any references you can add. Mike Young 13:19, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikistalk much?

Hi Beit Or. In the last half hour you have gone to a number of articles that I added material to and removed the material or otherwise undid my edits:

6:07pm : At Palestinian people, you made this edit removing the word nation, which was the subject of an RfC.
6:20pm : At Arab Jew, you removed an entire section I wrote at the request of another editor.
6:28pm : At Bethoron, which I significantly expanded just today, you deleted all this material.
6:35pm : At Facts on the Ground: Archaeological Practice and Territorial Self-Fashioning in Israeli Society, you reverted to restore a version of the article that contains WP:OR [2] which I had already discussed with the author of the sentence in question and he agreed with its removal.
6:41pm : At Nadia Abu El Haj you removed an entire section I just added yesterday on her impact among peers in the academic community, even though it is sourced and not repeated at the other article on her work as you claim in the edit summary.

I am going to ask you to revert all of these edits and discuss the specific problems you have with each one of them. I'm also going to ask that you stop using my article contribs as the basis for you editing choices today. Otherwise, I will report you to WP:ANI. Thanks very much. Tiamut 19:03, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tiamut, you know that your editing is problematic, that you edit from a strong anti-Israeli/anti-Jewish POV, do not use reliable sources, and engage in original research. I have witnessed all these problems on Palestinian people and other articles whenever our ways crossed, including those that you have linked above. And now I am very serious: you must change your ways if you do not wish to be community sanctioned or brought before an ArbCom. I strongly urge to reconsider your approach to editing and start following Wikipedia policies for a change. Beit Or 19:41, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please bring me before ArbComm. I am sick and tired of these baseless accusations and want the chance to clear my name of the noxious cloud of dust kicked up by people like you and Itzse (talk · contribs) who have no qualms making personal attacks. You were wiki-stalking and blind reverting on top of it. (Don't tell me that in half and hour you were able to read all the edits and sources you deleted in those five articles.) At the Facts on the Ground article you even reinserted material that was clearly WP:OR and had already been debunked on the talk page. So please spare me your tough talk and try to be more honest with yourself and others about what motivated your editing in that half hour. It certainly wasn't Wiki policy. Tiamut 00:19, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CIVIL

Please mind WP:Civil. Some of your recent comments border incivility. --Aminz 00:11, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 52: / Line 52: @@
 :Tiamut, you know that your editing is problematic, that you edit from a strong anti-Israeli/anti-Jewish POV, do not use reliable sources, and engage in original research. I have witnessed all these problems on [[Palestinian people]] and other articles whenever our ways crossed, including those that you have linked above. And now I am very serious: you must change your ways if you do not wish to be community sanctioned or brought before an ArbCom. I strongly urge to reconsider your approach to editing and start following Wikipedia policies for a change. [[User:Beit Or|Beit]] [[User talk:Beit Or|Or]] 19:41, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
+::Please bring me before ArbComm. I am sick and tired of these baseless accusations and want the chance to clear my name of the noxious cloud of dust kicked up by people like you and {{user|Itzse}} who have no qualms making [[WP:NPA|personal attacks]]. You were wiki-stalking and blind reverting on top of it. (Don't tell me that in half and hour you were able to read all the edits and sources you deleted in those five articles.) At the ''Facts on the Ground'' article you even reinserted material that was clearly [[WP:OR]] and had already been debunked on the talk page.  So please spare me your tough talk and try to be more honest with yourself and others about what motivated your editing in that half hour. It certainly wasn't Wiki policy. [[User:Tiamut|<b><font color="#B93B8F">T</font><font color="#800000">i</font><font color="#B93B8F">a</font><font color="#800000">m</font><font color="#B93B8F">u</font><font color="#800000">t</font></b>]] 00:19, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 == [[WP:CIVIL]] ==