Talk:History of the Slovak language: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 00:15, 18 January 2008

Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Slovakia Start‑class Mid‑importance

	Slovakia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Slovakia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Slovakia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SlovakiaWikipedia:WikiProject SlovakiaTemplate:WikiProject SlovakiaSlovakia articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please, site some sources, when was the first surviving Slovak written document issued? Where is it stored? I assume burgers were speaking German, since all Towns in Kingdom of Hungary were populated by Germans and Vallons. No Slovak is mentioned. Not even 15th century. If you think less, please, cite location and source --Vargatamas 17:48, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What kind of history is this?!

This whole article is a joke, right? Has this article have EVER been reviewed by a reputable historian?! Like no offense, but this article totally lacks any relevant and factual information.CoolKoon (talk) 22:29, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Would you mind clarifying which statement you consider POV, factually wrong, misleading, etc.? You cannot just put six templates to an article (by the way, one of them has already been there, so your addition is redundant) without presenting your arguments here. For now, I am going to remove the tags and I expect you to list your specific objections to what the article says before you put them back. Tankred (talk) 23:52, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just a quick answer: personally the whole article sounds to me as if it's been taken out of a fairy-tale book. I don't have time for this right now, but I'd rewrite the whole article (which sounds more like a collection of myths than a FACTUAL article about the Slovak language).

Revision as of 23:52, 17 January 2008 edit Tankred (talk \| contribs) 7,836 edits comment ← Previous edit		Revision as of 00:15, 18 January 2008 edit undo CoolKoon (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 2,163 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 8:		Line 8:

	:Would you mind clarifying which statement you consider POV, factually wrong, misleading, etc.? You cannot just put six templates to an article (by the way, one of them has already been there, so your addition is redundant) without presenting your arguments here. For now, I am going to remove the tags and I expect you to list your specific objections to what the article says before you put them back. [[User:Tankred\|Tankred]] ([[User talk:Tankred\|talk]]) 23:52, 17 January 2008 (UTC)		:Would you mind clarifying which statement you consider POV, factually wrong, misleading, etc.? You cannot just put six templates to an article (by the way, one of them has already been there, so your addition is redundant) without presenting your arguments here. For now, I am going to remove the tags and I expect you to list your specific objections to what the article says before you put them back. [[User:Tankred\|Tankred]] ([[User talk:Tankred\|talk]]) 23:52, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

			::Just a quick answer: personally the whole article sounds to me as if it's been taken out of a fairy-tale book. I don't have time for this right now, but I'd rewrite the whole article (which sounds more like a collection of myths than a FACTUAL article about the Slovak language).