Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tiptoety (talk | contribs)
Line 8: Line 8:
*{{Usercheck-short|Nirvana888}}&nbsp;<tt>|</tt>&nbsp;[[Special:Userrights/Nirvana888|<span style="color:#002bb8">'''give permission'''</span>]]
*{{Usercheck-short|Nirvana888}}&nbsp;<tt>|</tt>&nbsp;[[Special:Userrights/Nirvana888|<span style="color:#002bb8">'''give permission'''</span>]]
:I tend to revert a lot of vandalism on the [[Power in international relations]] project. Most of the pages I revert are controversial and prone to frequent petty vandalism. Multiple edits by unregistered IP users are a common occurrence. Rollback would be much obliged to assist in improving the quality of these pages by allowing cases of vandalism to be address promptly. Thanks. [[User:Nirvana888|Nirvana888]] ([[User talk:Nirvana888|talk]]) 00:59, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
:I tend to revert a lot of vandalism on the [[Power in international relations]] project. Most of the pages I revert are controversial and prone to frequent petty vandalism. Multiple edits by unregistered IP users are a common occurrence. Rollback would be much obliged to assist in improving the quality of these pages by allowing cases of vandalism to be address promptly. Thanks. [[User:Nirvana888|Nirvana888]] ([[User talk:Nirvana888|talk]]) 00:59, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
::{{Not done}} I am not sure you completely grasp what [[WP:VAND|vandalism]] is an is not judging by [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Superpower&diff=prev&oldid=226190132 this] which is clearly note vandalism. Consider using tools such as the undo button and [[WP:TW]] to revert vandalism then come back and re-apply in a month or so. Cheers, [[User:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#4E562C;font-weight:bold">Tiptoety</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#FFDB58">talk</span>]]</sup> 04:45, 19 July 2008 (UTC)


===[[User:Hfarmer]]===
===[[User:Hfarmer]]===

Revision as of 04:45, 19 July 2008

Rollback (add request)

User:Twas Now

I don't actively seek vandalism (unless I am extremely bored). However, I do revert vandalism when I see it; less often, I will undo edits of my own (a recent example and my explanation for that error). I also revert "unwanted" edits, but would not use rollback for this purpose. − Twas Now ( talkcontribse-mail ) 03:56, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Nirvana888

I tend to revert a lot of vandalism on the Power in international relations project. Most of the pages I revert are controversial and prone to frequent petty vandalism. Multiple edits by unregistered IP users are a common occurrence. Rollback would be much obliged to assist in improving the quality of these pages by allowing cases of vandalism to be address promptly. Thanks. Nirvana888 (talk) 00:59, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done I am not sure you completely grasp what vandalism is an is not judging by this which is clearly note vandalism. Consider using tools such as the undo button and WP:TW to revert vandalism then come back and re-apply in a month or so. Cheers, Tiptoety talk 04:45, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Hfarmer

The area of wikipedia I spend the most time watching are articles related to transsexuals,transgenderism and such. These topics are often controversial and prone to vandalism by ip editors, and the addition of nonsense by registered users. This tool would save me allot of time. I also revert general vandalism where I see it no matter the subject. Please see my contributions and talk. In about two years here I have never ever been accused of vandalism or disciplined even once.--Hfarmer (talk) 23:56, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Done - read WP:ROLLBACK before use. Fritzpoll (talk) 00:04, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Chuy1530

I revert vandalism when I see it and it'd be a bit quicker with rollback. If you think I need more time before getting rollback I understand though. Chuy1530 (talk) 22:26, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Acalamari 22:28, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:II MusLiM HyBRiD II

I need RollBack. Why? To revert Vandalism left by users and IP's. Yes, its true, i was given RollBack rights before, but they we're revoked by an administrator, regarding a new interstate template. So, its youre decision, see my contributions, if it'll help you. Cheers :D II MusLiM HyBRiD II (talk) 19:12, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Try this again. Your contributions show an understanding of what is/isn't vandalism, so I'm happy for you to have another try. PeterSymonds (talk) 19:30, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:TheSuave

I've been using Twinkle to patrol Special:RecentChanges and revert blatant vandalism, but have found that it isn't quick enough to revert multiple unconstructive edits simultaneously. Upon reading up on Huggle, I'd definitely like to be able to revert vandalism more efficiently, but lack Rollback to do this.

TheSuave (talk) 14:27, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Done PeterSymonds (talk) 15:31, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:rob-bob7-0

In the past I have committed some vandalism on wikipedia... However, I have taken a turn for the better and now would like pemission for rollback to use with huggle! Many Thanks!!
 Not done Your last vandalism warning was yesterday. You need at least a few months of experience, with no vandalism, before I can trust you with this tool. Thanks, PeterSymonds (talk) 15:32, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Theleftorium

I've been active on Wikipedia for a few months now and I've removed quite a lot of vandalism. Some popular pages (The Dark Knight for an example) get vandalized at least 5 times a day so I need a tool (Huggle) that will make removing what's been vandalized easier.

 Done - make sure you read and apply WP:ROLLBACK Fritzpoll (talk) 15:20, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Carbonrodney

Just started a mission against advertising on Wikipedia, with the help of Twinkle and a couple of other tools.

--Carbonrodney (talk) 06:41, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hrm, advertising is not technically vandalism, and native rollback should not be used to remove it. –xeno (talk) 13:06, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done sorry, but you don't seem to be aware what the tool is for. Come back in a month or so, and we'll see then. Fritzpoll (talk) 13:21, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Nskillen

I use huggle to watch recent changes, and 0.7.11 needs rollbacker Nskillen (talk) 00:14, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Please use rollback only for clear cases of vandalism. Tiptoety talk 01:28, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]