User talk:Roux: Difference between revisions

No. No it does not matter whether he said it first. And Wikipedia is not fair. You are required to be civil. Is that clear? Do not just blindly revert this with some statement in the edit summary, engage in actual conversation to show me why I should not ask an admin to block you to prevent further attacks. //roux 00:37, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Isnt he also required to be civil and not personally attack me as he did? Also thank you for giving me the tip on how to do that reference thing easier, and if I seemed to disrespect you that was not my attentio-(offering hand out to shake). Because i am just going to ignore Stephshep's attempts to lure me into getting blocked.--Threeblur0 (talk) 00:45, 29 March 2009 (UTC) --Threeblur0 (talk) 00:58, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Roux. You have new messages at Bradp521's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

someone else needs the whois speech

User talk:98.194.197.134 is doing the same thing as the other IP did, would you mind telling him about it? Momusufan (talk) 18:37, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD

We do not customarily use symbols with !votes at Afd.DGG (talk) 02:20, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bleh. I'm using a script from WP:US to make voting simpler. It appears to add them. I'm well aware of how AFD works though, thanks. //roux 02:21, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Akron Reflinks

Hello, Roux. You have new messages at Talk:Akron, Ohio.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

§hep ^Talk 20:10, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Arguably of interest to you?

You may be interested in scanning User talk:Tznkai#Missed the point?

In this context, you may be unexpectedly gratified by Caspian blue's arguably constructive contributions at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration where the complaint was captioned "Verifiability/Use English/Burdens in proxy battlefield article". [Note: This was the last diff before the request thread was blanked as part of the process of accepting an ArbCom case. To scan the discussion thread, you simply scroll down the page to find the full text. If you click on "next edit -->" at the top of the page, you can confirm for yourself what happens next.]. --Tenmei (talk) 20:55, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am simultaneously singularly uninterested in anything Caspian Blue does, and very specifically interested in keeping the hell away from his shotgun blasts of incivility and personal attacks. So, no. //roux 03:30, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for the unwelcome consequences which developed after my message on your talk page. It is plain that my words were a causative factor which led to the following recidivist blast from the past. In this context, no reasonable person would construe your words as a personal attack. --Tenmei (talk) 13:58, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Warning for your another personal attacks in March 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on User talk:Roux. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Roux, we all know your relentless incivility and habit of making "personal attacks" (quite amusing because those descriptions that you produce are just showing "your character" very well) are nothing new, but I want you to behave yourself like constructive editors. Please do not try to behave inappropriately even if on your user page. Good luck.--Caspian blue 10:28, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Let me get this clear: you are calling his comment in the section above this a personal attack? —Ed 17 ^{(Talk / Contribs)} 13:29, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think that sounds not personal attacks? Read WP:NPA.--Caspian blue 13:35, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Don't template the regulars, please. Do you know how much more seriously I would have taken a polite, hand-written note? –Juliancolton | ^Talk 13:40, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rules and policies have a superiority than essays that may contain "minority" view. I only respect editors acting respectively. If he desperately wants to keep the "hell away from me", he should not make this vicious comment behind my back; I am simultaneously singularly uninterested in anything Caspian Blue does, and very specifically interested in keeping the hell away from his shotgun blasts of incivility and personal attacks. So, no. --Caspian blue 13:49, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Behind your back, was it? As far as I can tell, it was right on-wiki... –Juliancolton | ^Talk 13:56, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 98: / Line 98: @@
 In this context, you may be unexpectedly gratified by [[User:Caspian blue|Caspian blue]]'s arguably constructive contributions at [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration]] where the complaint was captioned [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration&diff=prev&oldid=280511380  "Verifiability/Use English/Burdens in proxy battlefield article"]. [''Note: This was the last diff before the request thread was blanked as part of the process of accepting an ArbCom case.  To scan the discussion thread, you simply scroll down the page to find the full text. If you click on "next edit -->" at the top of the page, you can confirm for yourself what happens next.'']. --[[User:Tenmei|Tenmei]] ([[User talk:Tenmei|talk]]) 20:55, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 :I am simultaneously singularly uninterested in anything Caspian Blue does, and very ''specifically'' interested in keeping the hell away from his shotgun blasts of incivility and personal attacks. So, no. //[[User:Roux|<span style="color:#4B0082;font-size:80%;">'''roux'''</span>]] [[User talk:Roux|<span style="border:1px solid #4B0082;-moz-border-radius-topright:10px;-moz-border-radius-bottomleft:10px;padding:0px 7px;font-size:30%;">&nbsp;</span>]] 03:30, 31 March 2009 (UTC)</small>
+::I apologize for the unwelcome consequences which developed after my message on your talk page.  It is plain that my words were a causative factor which led to the following [http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/recidivist recidivist] [http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/blast_from_the_past blast from the past].  In this context, no [[reasonable person]] would construe your words as a personal attack. --[[User:Tenmei|Tenmei]] ([[User talk:Tenmei|talk]]) 13:58, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 == Warning for your [[WP:NPA|another personal attacks]] in March 2009  ==