Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Organized to Do Jehovah's Will

Organized to Do Jehovah's Will

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Organized to Do Jehovah's Will

Organized to Do Jehovah's Will (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable JW publication Jeffro77 (talk) 04:15, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

• Redirect To List of Jehovah's Witnesses publications. Pastor Theo (talk) 11:31, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
• Redirect to List of Jehovah's Witnesses publications. Reasoning: it's verifiable that this magazine exists, so reliably-sourced content about it has a place on Wikipedia, but it's not a notable publication, so it isn't entitled to its own article. The redirect is appropriate because this is a remotely-plausible search term. If the nominator will agree with us, then this can be speedily closed and redirected under speedy keep ground 1.—S Marshall ^Talk/_Cont 12:09, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
• Redirect for the very reasons S Marshall has expressed so well. Drawn Some (talk) 18:29, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

• Move material to a named section of Jehovah's Witnesses reference works and Redirect to it. The book is a "policy reference" rather than a Bible reference, but the article at Jehovah's Witnesses reference works allows material (the other is just a list).--AuthorityTam (talk) 23:34, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Just a note that this is a notable JW publication. If a JW has four books in his car, this is likely one of them (1)Bible, 2)Reasoning book, 3)Bible Teach book, 4)"OD" book (this one)).--AuthorityTam (talk) 23:41, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Presence of book in a JW's car isn't really the benchmark for notability on Wikipedia. However, if the book is actually notable enough for inclusion, suggest maybe a Jehovah's Witnesses organizational manuals for this book as well as Pay Attention book, as they're not really 'reference works'. Pay Attention is certainly more notable (or notorious) than this book, but it isn't easy to find reliable (rather than self-published) sources for it either.--Jeffro77 (talk) 08:57, 11 May 2009 (UTC)