Jump to content

User:Netoholic: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Other wisdom
Line 5: Line 5:
'''[[:Category:Boolean templates]]'''
'''[[:Category:Boolean templates]]'''
</div>
</div>

[[Image:Ferrigno as Hulk.jpg|thumb|400px|Current [[Wikipedia:Glossary#W|Wikistress]] level]]
<!-- FAIR USE of Image:Ferrigno as Hulk.jpg: see image description page at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Ferrigno as Hulk.jpg for rationale -->


<!-- [[Image:Sunflowers.jpg|thumb|400px|Current [[Wikipedia:Glossary#W|Wikistress]] level]] -->
<!-- [[Image:Sunflowers.jpg|thumb|400px|Current [[Wikipedia:Glossary#W|Wikistress]] level]] -->
Line 34: Line 37:
== Hilarity ensues ==
== Hilarity ensues ==
{| class="infobox" style=""
{| class="infobox" style=""
| [[Image:Cowbell2.gif|50px| ]]
|
|<big>'''This section needs more [[cowbell]].'''</big><br> You can help by [{{SERVER}}{{localurl:{{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}|action=edit}} adding more cowbell.]''
|<big>'''This section needs more [[cowbell]].'''</big><br> You can help by [{{SERVER}}{{localurl:{{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}|action=edit}} adding more cowbell.]''
<!-- FAIR USE of Image:Cowbell2.gif: see image description page at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Cowbell2.gif for rationale -->
<!-- FAIR USE of Image:Cowbell2.gif: see image description page at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Cowbell2.gif for rationale -->
Line 59: Line 62:
* ''[[Wikipedia:Ignore all rules]] is a paradox. One is expressly failing to "ignore all rules" by citing [[WP:IAR]].'' <br> In other words, if you do something and justify it with IAR, you are implicitly acknowledging that there are rules.
* ''[[Wikipedia:Ignore all rules]] is a paradox. One is expressly failing to "ignore all rules" by citing [[WP:IAR]].'' <br> In other words, if you do something and justify it with IAR, you are implicitly acknowledging that there are rules.


* <jwales> There are people who have good sense. There are idiots. A consensus of idiots does not override good sense. Wikipedia is not a democracy.
* <jwales> There are people who have good sense. There are idiots. A consensus of idiots does not override good sense. Wikipedia is not a democracy.


== Scratchpad ==
== Scratchpad ==

Revision as of 22:47, 3 February 2006

Oh my god... I've discovered the antichrist is alive on Wikipedia.

Category:If templates
Category:Boolean templates

File:Ferrigno as Hulk.jpg
Current Wikistress level


Interesting topics:

WikiPhilosophy:

Useful pages:

Items I am watching over:

Other links


Hilarity ensues

File:Cowbell2.gif This section needs more cowbell.
You can help by adding more cowbell.

Ideas

Netoholic's Law

As a wiki discussion grows longer, the probability of an accusation by one user of another acting unilaterally approaches one.

Look, I've made thousands of "unilateral" edits, so probably have you. It's a wiki. Get over it.

Corollary

One can substitute any of the following for "unilaterally", and the law still works -- "against consensus", "mindlessly", "carelessly". Any of these words indicates you might be facing off against a wiki-warrior.

Other wisdom

  • Wikipedia:Ignore all rules is a paradox. One is expressly failing to "ignore all rules" by citing WP:IAR.
    In other words, if you do something and justify it with IAR, you are implicitly acknowledging that there are rules.
  • <jwales> There are people who have good sense. There are idiots. A consensus of idiots does not override good sense. Wikipedia is not a democracy.

Scratchpad

  • [{{SERVER}}{{localurl:{{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}|action=edit}} edit] edit
  • [{{SERVER}}{{localurl:{{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}|action=purge}} purge] purge

Barnstars

Surreal barnstar
Phil Sandifer
19:51, 11 Nov 2005
For standing up to the misguided masses (myself included), helping to free Wikipedia from the hidden horrors of conditional meta-templates, I, Lifeisunfair, hereby present the Barnstar of Diligence to Netoholic.
David Levy
15:20, 23 Dec 2005