User:Netoholic: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
rvt wikistalker - stop vandalising my user page |
rm fair-use images used in violation of WP:FU |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
</div> |
</div> |
||
[[:Image:Ferrigno as Hulk.jpg|Current Wikistress level]] |
|||
<!-- FAIR USE of Image:Ferrigno as Hulk.jpg: see image description page at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Ferrigno as Hulk.jpg for rationale --> |
<!-- FAIR USE of Image:Ferrigno as Hulk.jpg: see image description page at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Ferrigno as Hulk.jpg for rationale --> |
||
| Line 37: | Line 36: | ||
== Hilarity ensues == |
== Hilarity ensues == |
||
{| class="infobox" style="" |
{| class="infobox" style="" |
||
| |
|||
| [[:Image:Cowbell2.gif|COWBELL]] |
|||
|<big>'''This section needs more [[cowbell]].'''</big><br> You can help by [{{SERVER}}{{localurl:{{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}|action=edit}} adding more cowbell.]'' |
|<big>'''This section needs more [[cowbell]].'''</big><br> You can help by [{{SERVER}}{{localurl:{{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}|action=edit}} adding more cowbell.]'' |
||
<!-- FAIR USE of Image:Cowbell2.gif: see image description page at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Cowbell2.gif for rationale --> |
<!-- FAIR USE of Image:Cowbell2.gif: see image description page at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Cowbell2.gif for rationale --> |
||
Revision as of 12:14, 4 February 2006
Oh my god... I've discovered the antichrist is alive on Wikipedia.
Interesting topics:
WikiPhilosophy:
Useful pages:
Items I am watching over:
- Special:Recentchangeslinked/List of collectible card games
- Category:Game stubs
- Category:Occupations
- Special:Whatlinkshere/Bad title
Other links
Hilarity ensues
| This section needs more cowbell. You can help by adding more cowbell. |
- Skateboarding trick
- "honk honk here comes the banmobile"
- User:Dmn(*) says goodbye in his own special way - Get A Life You Nob (see contribs from Dec 31 2004)
- It's important to warn users
- "Human should be a disambig page."
- I thought the page was using protection!
Ideas
Netoholic's Law
As a wiki discussion grows longer, the probability of an accusation by one user of another acting unilaterally approaches one.
- Look, I've made thousands of "unilateral" edits, so probably have you. It's a wiki. Get over it.
Corollary
One can substitute any of the following for "unilaterally", and the law still works -- "against consensus", "mindlessly", "carelessly". Any of these words indicates you might be facing off against a wiki-warrior.
Other wisdom
- The opposite of deletionism is not inclusionism; rather, the opposite is contribution.
- Wikipedia:Ignore all rules is a paradox. One is expressly failing to "ignore all rules" by citing WP:IAR.
In other words, if you do something and justify it with IAR, you are implicitly acknowledging that there are rules.
- <jwales> There are people who have good sense. There are idiots. A consensus of idiots does not override good sense. Wikipedia is not a democracy.
Scratchpad
- [{{SERVER}}{{localurl:{{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}|action=edit}} edit] edit
- [{{SERVER}}{{localurl:{{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}|action=purge}} purge] purge
Barnstars
Phil Sandifer
19:51, 11 Nov 2005
David Levy
15:20, 23 Dec 2005