Talk:Military career of Arthur Wellesley, 1st Duke of Wellington: Difference between revisions
Jim Sweeney (talk | contribs) not eligible for GA |
→Note for Editor/GA review: -reply to prig |
||
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
:Thank you, that is somewhat clearer wording and has been applied. <b>[[User:MarcusBritish|<font color="#003399">Ma<font color="#CC0000">®©</font>usBr<font color="#CC0000">iti</font>sh</font>''']] <sup>[</sup><sup>[[User talk:MarcusBritish|talk]]]</sup></b> 12:26, 3 August 2011 (UTC) |
:Thank you, that is somewhat clearer wording and has been applied. <b>[[User:MarcusBritish|<font color="#003399">Ma<font color="#CC0000">®©</font>usBr<font color="#CC0000">iti</font>sh</font>''']] <sup>[</sup><sup>[[User talk:MarcusBritish|talk]]]</sup></b> 12:26, 3 August 2011 (UTC) |
||
::As a list this article is not eligible as a Good Article see [[Wikipedia:Good article criteria]].[[User:Jim Sweeney|Jim Sweeney]] ([[User talk:Jim Sweeney|talk]]) 16:34, 3 August 2011 (UTC) |
::As a list this article is not eligible as a Good Article see [[Wikipedia:Good article criteria]].[[User:Jim Sweeney|Jim Sweeney]] ([[User talk:Jim Sweeney|talk]]) 16:34, 3 August 2011 (UTC) |
||
:::Have already discussed nominating this article for GA, long ago, with a MilHist coord. It's not a full list, anyway, only half the page constitutes a list - making it an article supported with a list. We'll let an independent reviewer decide. Mind your own biz! <b>[[User:MarcusBritish|<font color="#003399">Ma<font color="#CC0000">®©</font>usBr<font color="#CC0000">iti</font>sh</font>''']] <sup>[</sup><sup>[[User talk:MarcusBritish|talk]]]</sup></b> 17:32, 3 August 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:32, 3 August 2011
Military career of Arthur Wellesley, 1st Duke of Wellington is currently a War and military good article nominee. Nominated by Ma®©usBritish [talk] at 19:04, 2 August 2011 (UTC) An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria. Further reviews are welcome from any editor who has not contributed significantly to this article (or nominated it), and can be added to the review page, but the decision whether or not to list the article as a good article should be left to the first reviewer. Note: Interested in GA criteria-specific review/s rather than 'personal' opinions of historical content. |
|
Military history: Biography / British / European / Napoleonic era B‑class | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Note for Editor/GA review
This sentence could do with rewording:
- "In cases where the direct lack of his presence is established or unconfirmed, such engagements are not included in his battle record."
Makes it sound like cases where the direct lack of Wellington's presence is unconfirmed aren't counted i.e. times when he definitely was there. Maybe be better to say "Engagments where the direct lack of his presence is established, or where his presence is unconfirmed, are not included in his battle record."? 129.11.76.229 (talk) 10:29, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you, that is somewhat clearer wording and has been applied. Ma®©usBritish [talk] 12:26, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
- As a list this article is not eligible as a Good Article see Wikipedia:Good article criteria.Jim Sweeney (talk) 16:34, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
- Have already discussed nominating this article for GA, long ago, with a MilHist coord. It's not a full list, anyway, only half the page constitutes a list - making it an article supported with a list. We'll let an independent reviewer decide. Mind your own biz! Ma®©usBritish [talk] 17:32, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
- As a list this article is not eligible as a Good Article see Wikipedia:Good article criteria.Jim Sweeney (talk) 16:34, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
- Good article nominees
- Good article nominees on review
- B-Class military history articles
- B-Class biography (military) articles
- Military biography work group articles
- B-Class British military history articles
- British military history task force articles
- B-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- B-Class Napoleonic era articles
- Napoleonic era task force articles
- Requests for military history A-Class review