User:Daddy Kindsoul

Messages will be deleted once read.

3RR

You have been blocked for violation of the three-revert rule on Moi dix Mois for four days. I'm also going to take you to Request for Comment with Leyasu on Tuesday so we can stop this persistent edit war Sceptre ^(Talk) 23:36, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

You're not gonna get unblocked if you don't give a reason why you should be... --Rory096 00:10, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

I was blocked on 23:36, 16 March 2006 (UTC) (as seen above) for violating the 3RR by User:Sceptre... WP:3RR states, "after your fourth revert in 24 hours (UTC), sysops may block you for up to 24 hours." those 24 hours have now passed... after emailing User:Sceptre, I have still not been unblocked.

This seems to be an abuse of admin powers and violation of Wikipedia policy. - Deathrocker 00:14, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

This has been your 4th 3RR block, hence its valid, you are more than welcome to edit constructively when your block expires -- Tawker 00:50, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

This is your 6th or 7th block for 3RR. Repeat offenders can get longer blocks. --Rory096 00:51, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

Where does it state that as a Wikipedia policy?... it doesn't mention such a thing in WP:3RR or blocking policy. It just says sysops may block you for up to 24 hours." - Deathrocker 00:59, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

It is at the discretion of the admin, again, just wait the 4 days. -- Tawker 01:01, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

Where does it say its at the discretion of the admins though?? That is what I'm saying.

It does not mention such a thing in either Wikipedia:Blocking_policy or WP:3RR.. it just says up to 24 hours (which has already past), and states that as Wikipedia's official policy on the 3RR. It makes no mention of admins been able to impose more than that, infact it clearly states, "up to 24 hours". More than that is a violation of what is written there as the official policy. See my point? - Deathrocker 01:07, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

After your outburst on IRC, an unblock is asking a little much -- Tawker 06:53, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

You are refering to what?.. please don't remove the tag until an admin has looked at the case, as User:Sceptre has clearly violated Wikipedia:Blocking_policy and WP:3RR - Deathrocker 06:58, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

I am referring to someone using your nick calling me a "loser" -- Tawker 06:59, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

Well I don't even know what "IRC" is.. so can you show me what/where you are meaning please? - Deathrocker 07:00, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

Unblock

You've been engaging in a pattern of disruptive edits, and are attempting to game the system on 3RR. Admins are empowered to extend blocks for disruption, and Sceptre has done so. If the unblock template shows up here again, I'm giving you an extra week for disruption while we consider a permanent block on ANI. Essjay ^{Talk • Contact} 07:02, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

Game the system how? Using common sense more like.

All I am requesting is that you show me where it says admins are allowed to hand out blocks for a 3RR violation for far longer time than is stated to be the limit in WP:3RR (something which you are clearly unable to do and by failing to do so are supporting a clear violation of WP:3RR officially stated policies.)

And for your information I was blocked for violating 3RR, which has a maximum limit of "up to 24 hours" acording to WP:3RR, it is a perfectly reasonable request... rather pathetic that you are threatening me for questioning something that clearly violates Wikipedia policy. - Deathrocker 07:03, 18 March 2006 (UTC)