Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Brandt (9th nomination): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
close discussion: Speedy Keep
reverting speedy keep, let it be discussed first
Line 1: Line 1:

<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. ''
<!--Template:Afd top

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result of the discussion was '''Speedy Keep'''. [[User:Jaranda|Jaranda]] [[User_talk:Jaranda|<sup>wat's sup</sup>]] 21:34, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
===[[Daniel Brandt]]===
===[[Daniel Brandt]]===
The [[There is no cabal|Wikipedia cabal]] are really starting to show their true colors right now. Brandt is far, far, faaaaaar less notable than [[Angela Beesley|someone else]] up for deletion right now, and has long requested that the biographical article about him be deleted. For the last time, please show compassion and vote delete on this subject of borderline notability and '''respect their right to privacy'''. [[User:Hypokrysis|Hypokrysis]] 21:25, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
The [[There is no cabal|Wikipedia cabal]] are really starting to show their true colors right now. Brandt is far, far, faaaaaar less notable than [[Angela Beesley|someone else]] up for deletion right now, and has long requested that the biographical article about him be deleted. For the last time, please show compassion and vote delete on this subject of borderline notability and '''respect their right to privacy'''. [[User:Hypokrysis|Hypokrysis]] 21:25, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
Line 12: Line 4:
*'''Comment'''. This article has had eight previous AFD's. Also, that the subject wants the article to be deleted is irrelevant to this discussion. [[User:Extraordinary Machine|Extraordinary Machine]] 21:31, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
*'''Comment'''. This article has had eight previous AFD's. Also, that the subject wants the article to be deleted is irrelevant to this discussion. [[User:Extraordinary Machine|Extraordinary Machine]] 21:31, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
*'''Speedy Keep'''. Nomination fails [[WP:POINT]], although it might not be bad-faith, strictly speaking. [[User:Tevildo|Tevildo]] 21:33, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
*'''Speedy Keep'''. Nomination fails [[WP:POINT]], although it might not be bad-faith, strictly speaking. [[User:Tevildo|Tevildo]] 21:33, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Revision as of 21:40, 13 July 2006

Daniel Brandt

The Wikipedia cabal are really starting to show their true colors right now. Brandt is far, far, faaaaaar less notable than someone else up for deletion right now, and has long requested that the biographical article about him be deleted. For the last time, please show compassion and vote delete on this subject of borderline notability and respect their right to privacy. Hypokrysis 21:25, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment. This article has had eight previous AFD's. Also, that the subject wants the article to be deleted is irrelevant to this discussion. Extraordinary Machine 21:31, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy Keep. Nomination fails WP:POINT, although it might not be bad-faith, strictly speaking. Tevildo 21:33, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]