User:Snake Liquid: Difference between revisions
Snake Liquid (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
→Mission Statement: Remove user-specific material |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Mission Statement== |
==Mission Statement== |
||
⚫ | If you act on here, if you bend and twist Wikipedia's rules with semantics so that they help you out, and then contradict or twist them around again to use in authority against other people, if you ignore the sentiment of others to no end and persist on editing an article so that it says what you want to say without compromise, then I say, hello, I'd like to introduce myself. I'm Snake, and I'm your new problem. |
||
If you're like this guy: |
|||
:"This isn't a vote. It's a debate. Even if YTMND gets a bunch of people together to support Happycat, the admins have the final say. --Targetter 02:30, 30 July 2006 (UTC)" |
|||
And let's rework that to apply to all. "This isn't a vote. It's a debate. Even if people on one side of the debate gather supporters, it doesn't matter how much support they have because the admins have the final say." |
|||
⚫ | If |
||
I borrowed the following from user NEMT because I agree with it. |
I borrowed the following from user NEMT because I agree with it. |
Revision as of 00:57, 1 August 2006
Mission Statement
If you act on here, if you bend and twist Wikipedia's rules with semantics so that they help you out, and then contradict or twist them around again to use in authority against other people, if you ignore the sentiment of others to no end and persist on editing an article so that it says what you want to say without compromise, then I say, hello, I'd like to introduce myself. I'm Snake, and I'm your new problem.
I borrowed the following from user NEMT because I agree with it.
Tips/Warnings
If you're reading this, it's likely because you disagree with an edit or revert I've made. I don't apologize; take it up on the article's talk page before complaining on mine. Additionally, feel free to correct any formatting errors I've made, as I am admittedly far from an expert at Wiki code.
I believe everyone on Wikipedia should remember to stay cool when the editing gets hot. Ad hominems are usually uncalled for. It's also important you take note of the no angry mastodons principle. Most of all, though, USE COMMON SENSE, this applies double for "admins." Also, WP:POINT should be disregarded by all users.
I do not support the usage of non-babel userboxes, and I recommend new users avoid them. It's plain to see they promote factionism and cronyism amongst editors. This helps no one.
If you've got a problem with me, or something I said, do not come and tell me on my talk page. I don't plan on having my own talk page full of people either bitching/complaining or talking like they're from some elitist faction of wikipedia users, or talking like robots and telling me what they think I should do in accordance with Wikipedia rules (see below). If you do this, I'll just as soon delete it, because I doubt that any conversation you have with me on here is going to be worth saving, and because I won't tolerate it. Simply stated, simply learned. Don't be an idiot.
Trivia
The only rule I follow is WP:IAR.