User talk:The Kinslayer

Click here to leave a message.
I will reply to all messages on this page to avoid fractured conversations, and I do endeavor to leave some form of reply to all messages left, so add the page to your watch list, or check back later.
The Kinslayer

You're High-Larious!

Thank you Schavira, I try my best. The Kinslayer 09:45, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Lews Therin Telamon? - JNighthawk 02:22, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Nightwish - The Kinslayer 07:59, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Hi,

Theres a video interview with Daniel Sussman and Helen Mcmillan on www.britishgaming.co.uk which confirms the exact number of songs and also has more information on the 'rock chick' (who isnt called tj lawz)- except thats in part II that apparently hasnt been uploaded yet. Not too many new facts, but a lot of fascinating background stuff.

Thanks, I'll check this out this evening when I'm home from work. The Kinslayer 10:03, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Re:FCEUXD

I removed it because I do not think it is spam. It reads like a very neutral, balanced article that sets out the facts about the subject. enochlau (talk) 15:25, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

• Fair enough on the spam part, but it still warrants deletion on notability and indiscriminate information. The Kinslayer 15:26, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Freak xxi

I'm interpreting the release of four albums as a de facto assertion of notability. (Releasing four albums on a major or significant indie record label would meet WP:MUSIC, after all.) I was disinclined to speedily delete it as it's about a Spanish band (and thus it is more difficult to assess notability) and because the article is fairly well-developed. A {{prod}} tag would probably suffice for this case. The fact that there are no last names is troubling, so I would endorse a proposed deletion. I just don't think it's speediable. -- Merope ^Talk 15:55, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

OK, that's fair enough! Just wanted to know why. The Kinslayer 15:57, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Spam tags

Please be more careful in tagging articles with {{db-spam}}. Shibaricon, for instance, is a neutrally-written article on something obscure, not an advertisement for it. Keep in mind that speedy deletion is not the only way articles become deleted: there are two other processes: proposed deletion (PROD), and articles for deletion. See Wikipedia:Introduction to deletion process for a general intro. Thanks! Mangojuice^talk 13:37, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

In the case of what I consider borderline articles such as the one stated, my standard procedure is to Speedy first, then Prod if the article is judged to not meet the criteria for a speedy. In the case of the subject above, the lack of any third-party sources, and the single link to an official website, met my criteria for constituting an advert. The Kinslayer 13:59, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Steve Ridgway

Your speedy tag on Steve Ridgway has been removed because the subject is notable as a CEO of an airline. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 15:22, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, I realised but forgot to remove the tag! My bad. The Kinslayer 15:26, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Bite My Shiny Metal Ass!

Bite My Shiny Metal Ass! --Indie.Bones 15:31, 15 October 2006 (UTC)Indie Bones

• Such a prospect sounds painful and unpleasant for the both of us! The Kinslayer 15:36, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

P.S.-i am NOT a moron! --Indie.Bones 16:33, 19 October 2006 (UTC)Indie.Bones

Well, you fooled me, congratulations! Have a kitten. The Kinslayer 17:44, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

Crystal Ball-Gazing?

Regarding the "proposed deletion" tag added to the Dragon Ball AF article...

Would you care to elaborate on what you mean by your comment? This article's purpose is to inform readers about a topic that is well-known in the context of Dragon Ball and its fans, which has reached the status of a "myth" in the fandom. The article expressly avoids speculation on "plot points" and the like (as naïve fans are wont to do), concentrating instead on the origins and means of distribution of the myth, as well as emphasizing the facts in the situation. Perhaps a purely descriptive approach to the rumors (while still focusing on the factual evidence against them) would be better, but I and others who have worked on this page viewed such a format as likely to only further misunderstandings by those who read the article without an eye for context. If you wish to give any concrete reasons as to why the page ought to be deleted, then please do so. I realize that the article treads close to the line of fancruft, but as its intent is to inform readers on a topic that is remarkably persistent and raised all too often, I believe that it has value. --Julian Grybowski 15:33, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

You know, I can't be arsed replying in any detail to this. The Kinslayer 15:37, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

The user page

I was wondering, how do you get those box things with the words in them? I know it's coding, but is there a list of ones with specific words? MB 20:34, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

I started looking here and just poked around looking for ones I wanted. The Kinslayer 20:40, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Bully(Talk Page)

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. --Vercalos 23:42, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

Please do not remove legitimate warnings from your talk page or replace them with inappropriate content. Removing or maliciously altering warnings from your talk page will not remove them from the page history. You're welcome to archive your talk page, but be sure to provide a link to any deleted legitimate comments. If you continue to remove or vandalize legitimate warnings from your talk page, you will lose your privilege of editing your talk page. Thanks. --Vercalos 20:43, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Personal Attacks

With regards to your comments on Bully (video game): Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. "Do not make personal attacks anywhere in Wikipedia. Comment on content, not on the contributor. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users." Please keep this in mind while editing. Thanks. --Chris Griswold (☎☓) 20:45, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

In that case, your comment can kiss my ass. The Kinslayer 20:46, 24 October 2006 (UTC)