Talk:Johann Nestroy: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Re SONGS. The article speaks of Nestroy's songs ''elaborating the theme or helping on with the plot''. A truly brilliant formulation. Nestroy would have loved it. He would have worked it right into one of his plays. We can easily imagine some cobbler or locksmith who has become a "marchandmode" postulating about Mozart having written his music for ''elaborating the theme or helping on with the plot''.--[[User:BZ(Bruno Zollinger)|BZ(Bruno Zollinger)]] 08:50, 25 October 2006 (UTC) |
Re SONGS. The article speaks of Nestroy's songs ''elaborating the theme or helping on with the plot''. A truly brilliant formulation. Nestroy would have loved it. He would have worked it right into one of his plays. We can easily imagine some cobbler or locksmith who has become a "marchandmode" postulating about Mozart having written his music for ''elaborating the theme or helping on with the plot''.--[[User:BZ(Bruno Zollinger)|BZ(Bruno Zollinger)]] 08:50, 25 October 2006 (UTC) |
||
Re PLOTS. It can easily be shown that the plots of Nestroy's plays are not of his own making. He takes whatever is around and goes out of his way to make clear that he finds the creaking machinery utterly ridiculous. The plots just serve him as vehicles to transport his wordplay and his songs, which contain the essence of his thinking. This brings us to an interesting point. If anybody were to mention these facts in a Wikipedia article, he would do so in clear violation of Wikipedia's rules and regulations. It isn't Wikipedia's job to report any facts. It is Wikipedia's job to gives us the opinions of German Literaturprofessoren and their Honnorary Amerikanische Kollegen. And that's what it does.--[[User:BZ(Bruno Zollinger)|BZ(Bruno Zollinger)]] 08:33, 26 October 2006 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 08:33, 26 October 2006
Das is a verruckte Idee
Re SONGS. The article speaks of Nestroy's songs elaborating the theme or helping on with the plot. A truly brilliant formulation. Nestroy would have loved it. He would have worked it right into one of his plays. We can easily imagine some cobbler or locksmith who has become a "marchandmode" postulating about Mozart having written his music for elaborating the theme or helping on with the plot.--BZ(Bruno Zollinger) 08:50, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
Re PLOTS. It can easily be shown that the plots of Nestroy's plays are not of his own making. He takes whatever is around and goes out of his way to make clear that he finds the creaking machinery utterly ridiculous. The plots just serve him as vehicles to transport his wordplay and his songs, which contain the essence of his thinking. This brings us to an interesting point. If anybody were to mention these facts in a Wikipedia article, he would do so in clear violation of Wikipedia's rules and regulations. It isn't Wikipedia's job to report any facts. It is Wikipedia's job to gives us the opinions of German Literaturprofessoren and their Honnorary Amerikanische Kollegen. And that's what it does.--BZ(Bruno Zollinger) 08:33, 26 October 2006 (UTC)